Talk:Steven Pressman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Steven Pressman article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

[edit] Mark1800's opinion

It's not an advertisement just because you say it is. Please discuss specifics. Kat'n'Yarn 07:56, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

While I'm not sure about specifics on this. The book artical Outrageous_Betrayal smacks of advertising to me. Mark1800 08:10, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

That's your POV. Look at other articles on books and articulate what you think is more promotional than a neutral point of view would be. Also keep in mind that any opinions need to be based on reliable published sources, not how you feel about it. Kat'n'Yarn 08:21, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Well, I just followed the twisted web that's been weaved from the LM page all the way to here. I have to say that I find this particular page to be rather below quality. Wether it's NPOV or not isn't really something I'm particularily capable or (to be honest) interested in, but... I think it could use some serious re-arrangement. For example, taking a quick look at a few other Authors, I noted that generally speaking, there's a "Biography" section, instead of having the header include all of that information. Also, the "Published Works" section isn't particularily well organized. It should be "Articles" and "Books," not "Articles" and "Outrageous Betrayal." I think there's other work that could be done to it, but it's very early in the morning, and I'm getting sleepy. Inoko 13:33, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

• I must also state that I resent these personal attacks from user Mark1800 as well. I am most certainly not Steven Pressman, and have taken care to accurately cite multiple sources in sourced, blockquoted referenced citation format when citing sources, in order to make sure I am not adding my own POV to articles, but simply information from reliable sources.Smeelgova 12:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)