Talk:Status symbol

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Status symbol article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is supported by the Sociology WikiProject, which gives a central approach to Sociology and related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article Status symbol, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Contents 1 Relevant topics 2 Suggestion 3 Quality concerns 4 Status Symbol Band Reference

[edit] Relevant topics

Perhaps "conspicuous consumption" is a relevant concept to include here.(This comment was left by 82.68.202.222)

---

I myself categorized this article in "symbols". I'm not sure if this is the appropriate categorization. It seemed to be the only place the article could really fall, and having an article without a category seemed destructive.--Hyperlink 04:58, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Suggestion

I believe this website should have more maps and interactive media softwear (This comment was left by 203.51.37.181)

[edit] Quality concerns

This article does not cite any sources, and is in dire need of formatting and research. Until some authorative sources are cited and the article is appropriately formatted it does to some extend compromise Wikipedia's integrity, espcially since this subject should be covered by a GA. Best Regards, Signature^brendel 08:33, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

I concur. The article is a mess. --Coolcaesar 09:40, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Status Symbol Band Reference

The information about the band "status symbol" was obviously posted by a member of the band as it references the fact that they're "working very hard and have played a few shows." Furthermore, this is not the appropriate place for such a reference, the band should be on their own page. I'm removing the reference to the band and suggest that no page be created about them as they appear to not be particularly worthy of encyclopedia note. Kalemika 23:05, 1 February 2007 (UTC)