Talk:Star Fox Adventures

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Famicom style controller This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.
This article has an archived CVG peer review that may contain ideas for improvement.

Wikitendo logo This article is part of WikiProject Nintendo, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Nintendo related merchandise and video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Good articles Star Fox Adventures (reviewed version) has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do.
If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.
To-do list for Star Fox Adventures: edit  · history  · watch  · refresh
  • copyedit plot section

  • Submit for FA
Maintained The following users are actively contributing to this topic and may be able to help with questions about verification and sources:
Thunderbrand (talk contribs)

[edit] Dinosaur Planet

I made a page for the Dinosaur Planet Game, the original version of Adventures ~Guess who i am 1:07pm Saturday 26 August 2006

I think that Dinosaur Planet and Adventures pages should remain seperate they are different games, with different characters and plotlines, it would be too crowded on one page, keep them seperate. ~Guess who i am 7:58pm Saturday 26 August 2006

I could go either way. On one hand, we should keep all the info on this page, but I don't really mind if it has a seperate page. Thunderbrand 12:13, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
I don't think it's necessary. They're not really two different games but rather just one game that underwent a huge overhaul. If this article was getting extremely long than I would have no problem with a seperate article, but right now length isn't really an issue. Perhaps you could just merge and redirect the article to here? (I say this because it wouldn't surprise me if it ended up on AfD soon.) Robert 14:28, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
I believe that the Dinosaur Planet page should just be deleted altogether. There really isn't anything on that page that wasn't covered on the Star Fox Adventures page. PlatformerMastah 03:32, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
You'd either have to take it to AfD or the author has to request a speedy. There's no criteria I can use to speedy it. Robert 14:53, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
There was a bit on there that wasn't covered on here and wouldn't fit such as the storyline and characters ~Guess who i am 27 August 4:50pm 2006
The storyline can easily fit into the Origins section of this article, and Sabre and Kyte are mentioned here as well. I strongly suggest anything not already in this article be merged here and the Dinosaur Planet article redirected here. Also, please remember to sign your posts with four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Robert 14:53, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Kyte isn't mentioned and I think that a seperate page can do better, so that there can be links to various media for the game, Earthbound 64 and Mother 3 (which are the same game) have different pages they are better seperated Guess who i am 23:42, 27 August 2006 (UTC)Guess who i am Monday 28th August 2006 9:42AM

Merge -More material, easier to get a Good Article out of it... I'm a mergist :) Judgesurreal777 01:13, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

I went and redirected it. All the info can be comfortably contained here (or is here already). Thunderbrand 14:30, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA passed

Compared to the GA criteria the article is :

1. Well written?: Pass
2. Factually accurate?: Pass
3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
5. Article stability? Pass
6. Images?: Pass

There is nothing more I can say, this article is well-written and tightly stays on the subject while making comparisons with other games in different fields that appeared at about the same time. It might need a bit more copyediting for the Plot section in my opinion but it still is thoroughly well done. Congrats for the GA status. Lincher 14:28, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! I do agree the plot could use a bit more work, and will continue to improve upon it. Thunderbrand 14:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC)