Talk:Stacey Dash

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stacey Dash article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

Stub

This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ]
(If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality.

- This whole entry reads like her agent wrote it. This needs some serious work. Neutrality would be a good thing here.

[edit] Hidiously biased

This whole entry reads like her copy edited resume. It's horrible. Either her mother wrote this or some obsessed fan. It needs a lot of work to get it up to wiki standards.

(J.Mercier 11/3/2006) - Agreed. If not heavily edited then this whole article should be scrapped as it reads like a fan site intro page. Comments like "while underappreciated she continues to steal the scene" is such a patent editorial there is no room for debate. This type of material is just fodder for Encyclopedia Britannica's FUD. (note: I cleaned this up by removing the offending two sentences from the latter half of the first paragraph, however I was not logged in.) (Tolstoy143 - Quos vult perdere dementat 01:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC))