User talk:St jimmy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Siva1979Talk to me 15:55, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Welcome again

On the talk page of meat, you requested a minor change be made to the article(I've done it). I'm going to encourage you to Be Bold and go for it! You can change ANYTHING! I absolutely love your user name by the way. Happy editing --Banana04131 00:46, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. The reason I didn't change it was because I wasn't 100% sure of my facts. St jimmy 15:05, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] i would like to join how do i tho

i want to join the counter vandalism unit

Go to my user page and click the link in the Counter-Vandalism unit box. There'll be instructions there. St jimmy 09:39, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
I would suggest not permitting a vandal to join. — ceejayoz talk 17:00, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 Im not a vandal, you(Ceejayoz) are an idiot, your atheism is proof
WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT MEAN? St jimmy 11:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

I wasnt talking to u saint jimmy

That's not the point. I could be an atheist as well (I'm not as it happens). How does being an atheist make me an idiot. Blind faith is even more stupid. Don't be such an intolerant dick. St jimmy 11:31, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

i do agree with u faith is another word for ignorance, but if u doint believe in anything, ure an idiot

That's shit and you know it. Some of the most intelligent people on the planet are atheists. St jimmy 13:00, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

like who, theyre either jews or christians

Like most of the world's scientists. And what about muslims, buddists and hindus? St jimmy 09:44, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

there 2 busy running planes into buildings or learning self control from n 800 lb. god (buddha), there idiots 2

You are such a fucking racist. Any1 who disagrees with you is an idiot that makes you an idiot. St jimmy 10:58, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

that doesnt make sense andits my point of view so wat

You dont respect other ppls point of view or religion. Whatever you belive has to be right and any1 who disagrees is an idiot. St jimmy 11:37, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

no, i am just rite most of the time

You may believe you're right but other ppl don't. They hold different beliefs. That doesn't make them idiots it just makes them different. St jimmy 13:24, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

no but being an extremist makes u retard and most of them are extremists

No they're not. Most ppl aren't extremeists. That's why the extremists are called extremists. St. Jimmy 09:23, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

that didnt make senses rare isnt the same as extremists

Yeah but there have to be moderates to make the extremists extremists. And anyway, it's not fair to say all Muslims are extremists bcos its blatantly not true. St. Jimmy 11:39, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

2 of my friends r muslims i have no problem with that, middle eastern muslims are dangerous

Not all of them. St. Jimmy 11:55, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

      • right, there all friendly people who love americans, (im being sarcastic by the way)--Andy 23:19, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Very few people outside of america love america. It's not just muslims who hate americans. St. Jimmy 11:31, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

no i no a lot of non americans who love and envy them

envy?St. Jimmy 10:06, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • ya, the capitolism and the freedom, etc.--Andy 20:46, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

capitalism isn't a good thing. Americans just think it is. St. Jimmy 11:26, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

  • where are u from, and by the way being rich uis a great thing, even the chance of being rich is a good thing--Andy 21:47, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

In order yo have rich people there must also be poor people. St. Jimmy 19:49, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

  • not necesarilly.--TheNation 01:49, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Richness is relative. If we can all afford to pay more for products then prices go up until some people can't. They are the poor. The only way to avoid that is if everyone has exactly the same amount of money and that is called Communism. St. Jimmy 22:11, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

not everyone has to be the same, there ar just no poor people, --TheNation 23:56, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

the people with least are the poor St. Jimmy 09:44, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

in communism everyone is poor, in my dreamworld, everyone is rich, there is no one who has least--TheNation 06:01, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes but unfortunately your dreamworld is just that - a dream. St. Jimmy 21:06, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

But what about the political aspects of communism, less freedom is given to the people, in the gov I'm describing, money is the same but monetary aspects are different then communism.--TheNation 03:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Well how do you keep money the same? Does the government take it all and then share it out equally every so often? In that case why would anyone bother to work hard? Then you'd have to make people work - ie restrict freedom. That's why communism became what it became.

If the govt. doesn't do what I said then after a few generations there will be a divide between rich and poor again. That's how free-market, capitalism works. Some people succeed - other's fail. St. Jimmy 21:29, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Why would the people not want to work so hard, just because you want it to be true doesnt mean it is, everybody works hard at there jobs in this GOV.--TheNation 19:59, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

People work hard for financial gain. If the government just evens it out every so often then there is no gain so SOME people won't work hard. That's what happened in Communist countries and that's why Stalin, for example, had to force people into Gulags. St. Jimmy 21:37, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

what are we arguing about again?--TheNation 04:51, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

I was explaining why Capitalism is an imperfect system. St. Jimmy 21:48, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

No system is perfect, but in my opinion its the best system, communism fails becuse people are greedy, it's naturally intilled in the human psyche.--TheNation 06:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

That's why all systems ultimately fail. St. Jimmy 16:30, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Yo

Whats wrong wit my man G.W Bush

He's an idiot with too much power. St jimmy 09:42, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
               So every president has 2 much power? Swainstonation

we have a congress and a supreme court for a reason, so 1 person doesnt get 2 powerful

He's too stupid to be president. And he's crazy. he said God told him to invade iraq. St jimmy 11:01, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
so what he has religion, thats a good thing, hes not crazy eithe, ur crazy cuz ur a commie

 "rather be dead than red"
My problems not with him being religious, it's with him hearing voices. And having the power to launch a war based on what those voices telling him. St jimmy 11:29, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

he alone doesnt have the power to launch the war, u need congress and the UN to agree, so u think everyone involved in the government is "hearing voices" with him, ur paranoid

He has the power to send troops wherever he wants. he just needs congress to approve funding.
And he's ruining the environment. He pulled the US out of the kyoto agreement. He says (until recently) that global warming is just a theory.St jimmy 13:02, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

ya but there is no real reason behind why its happening, it could just be an uatural process (global warming), dont u need money to send troops anywhere, they cant just walk and eat sand, you have ship them out and supply them with goods

Yes global warming occurs naturally, but slowly. We are acelerating the process by pumping CO2 into the air. The science is there to back it up.
And he can send troops wherever he wants without consulting congress. Once they're there congress has to provide funding or allow troops to die. St jimmy 11:31, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

he only has 3 more years so stop woerrying sbout it and its not just him hoo causes C02 gas to go in there air its everybody

Yes but Kyoto was meant to cut down emissions from countries. But the biggest polluter in the world (the US) isn't part of it. That's his fault.
And 3 years is pleanty of time for him to fuck up the worldSt jimmy 10:51, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

its commies like u hoo fuck up the world

It wasn't commies who dropped two atomic bombs on Japan. It wasn't commies who invaded Iraq for oil. And It isn't commies who are gonna start a war in the Middle East and bring about our destruction with global warming. St jimmy 11:31, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

but it was a commie who killed kennedy and it was a commie hoo had nuclear weapons aiming toward america, if lauunched would wipe out the entire US

And the americans had nukes aimed right back at them. St jimmy 13:22, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

that was after that had them aimed at us it was for protection not destruction

And the russians would say the exact same about the Americans. There's no point trying to say one side was right in the cold war. St. Jimmy 09:26, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

they had weapons on us first

But they never used them. You guys dropped two. St. Jimmy 11:31, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

to end the war they brought us into, ever heard of pearl harbor

nuclear power can be more dangrous than fosils fuels to ever heard of Chernobyl

Pearl Harbour was Japan. And nuclear power is safe. Chernobyl and 3 Mile Island were the only meltdowns in the history of nuclear power. And it doesn't cause global warming. St. Jimmy 11:47, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

so wat it causes mutation and cancer, and wat does the japan thing mean, i no it was ja[an im just saying we used them to end the war thay brought us into--Andy 23:19, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

People who live over granite actually recieve a higher dose of radiation than those living near a nuclear plant.

And about the japan thing. They didn't need to blow up two cities to end the war, they were winning anyway. They dropped those bombs to punish Japan so that no one would ever defy america again. And it's a war crime. St. Jimmy 11:43, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

its not our fault to want to protect our country and make sure something that horrible never happens again, and if we start puuting nuclear power plants every where than that would be our last generation because it would make everyone sterile, fossil fuels dont do that do they, no

Neither do nuclear plants. St. Jimmy 10:47, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
      • ya they do--Andy 20:45, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
They may cause a slight drop in fertility but they don't make ppl sterile. St. Jimmy 11:28, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
    • prolonged exposure does and a lot nore nuclear power plants will overexpose a lot more people, esp. the ones that work there--Andy 21:46, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

You'd swear that they just put a lump of uranium out in the open for people to come along and get exposed. They don't. It's all done in a way that minimises the public's exposure. Like i said before people who live over granite actually recieve a higher dose of radiation than those living near a nuclear plant. And the people who work there aren't forced to work their. They are paid. St. Jimmy 22:14, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Ever heard of three mile island of Chernobyl, and i dont think that thing about granite is true,=, i want proof--TheNation 23:58, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

It's to do with radon which forms in granite areas. St. Jimmy 09:45, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] COTW Project

You voted for Fauna (animals), this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. -Scottwiki 09:34, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Signature

How do you change your signature. (Ie what happens when you type ~~~~) i've seen some ppl with really cool ones like Siva1979 above. St jimmy 13:29, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

The process is documented at WP:SIG, hope you find it useful, and get a nice readable sig ;) --NigelJ talk 13:32, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Just testing St. Jimmy

[edit] Communism

Just thought I'd explain about the communism thing. I posted a Communist infobox because I agree with the Communist ideal: "each man takes what he needs and contributes what he can" or something like that.

That does not mean that I agree with what happened in Russia which essentially became a dictatorship. St. Jimmy 14:56, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] COTW Project

You voted for 20th century music, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. PDXblazers 02:25, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Energy portal

Hi! As a contributor to WikiProject Energy development, I thought you might like to be aware of the opportunity to contribute to the new Energy Portal, now that there is one... No need to reply. Gralo 17:43, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Good On You

Good on you St Jimmy, I tend to agree with your views and ideas. If there was more people like you in the world, it would be a much better place. Sticking up for other religions, races and beliefs, and what you stand and don't stand for on your talk page. The Anonymous User 23:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. There's nothing I hate more then people who don't respect other people's ideas. St. Jimmy 21:22, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Rock music invitation

Hello WikiProject Alternative music member.
WikiProject Alternative music, in my eyes, has proved to be successful "improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock", and improving their quality as well. One specific example I have witnessed is The Smashing Pumpkins article. The page has gone from a mediocre work, to GA status, to FA nomination. Only appropriate, as the Pumpkins are undeniably one of the most influential alternative rock bands on the 1990's and beyond.
This is the stuff I wish to achieve with the somewhat recently ressurected WikiProject Rock music. I hope to also attract attention to rock music articles of all sorts, and hopefully change some to GA or FA status. I invite you to come join us, and not only be a member of alternative Wikipedians, but the rockin' ones as well.
Rock on.
--Reaper X 02:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] You helped choose Rwandan Genocide as this week's WP:ACID winner

 Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Rwandan Genocide was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

AzaBot 23:06, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Energy portal & future selected articles

Hi! Over the past couple of months I've been spending much more time than I should developing the Energy portal, and intend asking for a portal peer review within the next day or so.

The portal provides a showcase for energy-related articles on Wikipedia. One of the most prominent ways is via a the selected article that is currently changed every 6 weeks or so. It would be good to increase this turnover, and with three Wikiprojects dedicated to energy-related topics and a good number of articles already written, I'd like to suggest that members of each Wikiproject might like to use the 'selected article' to feature some of their best work.

With this in mind, I'd like to suggest that your Wikiproject bypasses the normal selected article nomination page and decides collectively which articles are worth featuring - or these may be self-evident from previous discussions - and add short 'introduction' to the selected article at the appropriate place on page Portal:Energy/Selected article/Drafts, which includes further information. Your personal involvement would be welcome!

Please make any comments on your Wikiproject talk page, my talk page, or on Portal talk:Energy/Selected article/Drafts, as appropriate. Gralo 15:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Red Hot Chili Peppers WikiProject

Dear St jimmy:

I invite you to join and aid the WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers, in our fight to provide complete and thorough knowledge of the Red Hot Chili Peppers; whether it be a few minor details or a complete revamp of an entire article. We aim to improve the quality and encyclopedic coverage on all articles within relation to the Red Hot Chili Peppers. The article's current state is improving drastically, and, with more widespread attention, GA status, for both the main page and John Frusciante is not far away. Thanks for considering,
Regards,
NSR77 (Talk|Contribs) 01:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../s/t/_/User_talk%7ESt_jimmy_1045.html"