Talk:St. Peter and St. Paul's Church, Vilnius
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Let's "reference" it as much as possible ;) Iulius 16:54, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- It's hard because each statement usually has several sources ... :-( --Lysytalk 18:25, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- reference only doubtful of them Iulius 18:27, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- What is doubtful ? I don't know. --Lysytalk 18:46, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- i don't know either Iulius 09:29, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Hic Jacet Pecator
Iulius, why did you remove "Hic Jacet Pecator" with the comment "no such text" ? the text is even clearly visible in the photo if you magnify it. It's exactly where there stone is broken (supposedly due to a lightning). --Lysytalk 08:43, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
-
- i'm sorry if i'm blind Iulius 09:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
this should help M.K. 09:49, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Change of the name
I propose to change the name of the article slightly to "St. Peter and St. Paul's Church, Vilnius", to be closer to generally accepted conventions.Iulius 05:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The Chapel of Polish Queens
There used to be the Chapel of Polish Queens to the left, near to the entrance. After Vilnius returned to Lithuania, it was changed into simply the Chapel of Queens. Does anyone know when and why was it renamed. Well, I can imagine why, but more details would be interesting. Was the inscription in the arch of the ceiling changed during some recent renovation or was it earlier ? --Lysytalk 15:23, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The founder's tablet
The founder's tombstone picture is interesting because while not of particular artistic value, it has a story to it (I'm sure you know it). Now, people will read a story and be able to see how the stone looks like. This seems more interesting than just another shot of the dome. If you'd like to see more pictures of interior details, I have a number of such shots, but they would overcrowd the article, and I think the diversity of images is what makes their illustration value and the whole article more interesting. --Lysytalk 16:21, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- howewer this image is unfotogenic at all: little use of it tumbnailed. So it best to be edited or presented some other way. Iulius 17:20, 27 October 2006 (UTC)