Talk:Srinagar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Srinagar was the Indian collaboration of the week for the week starting on February 3, 2006.

For details on improvements made to the article, see history of past collaborations.

WikiProject_India This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
This article is maintained by the Indian cities workgroup.
Please help improve this article or section by expanding it.
Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion.
This article has been tagged since January 2007.

This is the talk page for discussing changes to the Srinagar article.

Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page and give them ==A Descriptive Header==. If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia and frequently asked questions. Please note this is not a forum for discussing the topic generally.

Talk page guidelines

Please respect etiquette and assume good faith. Also be nice and remain civil.

[edit] Images

Some one may organize images in wiki-commons, and give a link here. --Bhadani 15:55, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] POV

'Currently, the issue of Srinagar, having become an integral part of India, stands settled beyond any doubt, in spite of certain insurgent elements operating from the soil of India, as also from outside the borders of India.'

I think much more needs to be mention about the insurgency... dealing with it in a single sentence is bypassing a major issue, and disrespect for the many people, both soldiers and civilains, who have died due to the conflict there... All I'm askng for is extending the history of the city discribe what happened there in the last 20 years.

Another point is there no mention about the impact of the insurgency on tourism in the history section or about it limping back on growing domestic tourists population.

hydkat 21:06, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

'truth always triumphs' (written on the Indian national emblem)

From Foreign and Comonwealth office. On 1 June 2006, 26 tourists were injured in two grenade attacks against their buses near Dal Lake, Srinagar. On 25 May 2006, four tourists were killed and seven others injured in a grenade attack on a tourist bus in Srinagar. On 22 May 2006, two people were killed in an attack on a tourist coach on the outskirts of Srinagar. Three grenade attacks in Srinagar on the same day injured over 40 people. On 21 May 2006, six persons were killed and 35 others injured when militants attacked a political rally in central Srinagar. On 1 May 2006, 35 civilians were kidnapped and murdered by militants in Doda district of in Indian-administered Kashmir. On 27 April 2006, seven tourists and nine local residents were injured, one of them critically, in a grenade blast at the bus terminus in Pahalgam, a tourist resort 96km south of Srinagar. On 14 April 2006, seven separate grenade attacks in central attacks in central Srinagar left five dead and 46 others injured. On 2 November 2005, a car bomb on the outskirts of Srinagar, which killed six and injured 16 people.

[edit] Who are these people?

I have lived my entire life in Srinagar and I have never heard the names of the following people which have been listed as leaders of Srinagar:

  1. Dr Agnishekhar
  2. Dr Ajay Chrangoo
  3. Mr Ashwani Chrangoo
  4. Dr Utpal Kaul
  5. Dr KL Chowdhary

They might have their roots in Srinagar but they sure enough do not qualify to be called "Current leaders of the city"

  1. Dr Shakti Bhan is a doctor, a well know one, but by no way a Leader!

Are people trying to create true and honest information on Srinagar or are we fighting to whom Srinagar belongs. And since Srinagar is the capital of a disputed territory, it should be put as such.

Wullar 12:15, 12 December 2006 (UTC)