From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Squirtle article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
|
|
|
Article policies
|
|
A request has been made for this article to be peer reviewed to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved. Please make any edits you see fit to improve the quality of this article. |
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale. |
Low |
This article is on a subject of low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. |
CVG To-do:
- Expand: New CVG Articles, Normality, Pac-Man World 2, Operation Flashpoint: Elite, Call of Juarez, Galactic Civilizations II: Dark Avatar, Ford Street Racing, Betrayal at Krondor
- CVG Peer Review: List of F-Zero titles, Kya: Dark Lineage, Wii Remote, Dynasty Warriors 4, The Sims 2, The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past, Kirby's Dream Land, Electronic sports, Fire Emblem, Dante (Devil May Cry), The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, Final Fantasy XII, Sonic the Hedgehog (16-bit), Classes in World of Warcraft
- Cleanup: Age of Mythology, Mario Kart: Double Dash!!, Betrayal at Krondor, List of Nintendo trademarks
- Merge:
- Deletions / Essential articles / Magazines
- Assess and Prioritise articles (Log)
|
[edit] GA status
Passed. Appropriate references, gives a good explanation of what the creature is, and has competent sections on what role was played in the video games. I'm somewhat dissapointed the article did not posess a charteristics section like others I'd noted of this type, though. This may be attributed to the data on the creature. -ZeroTalk 19:57, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- It does, but it's merged with the lead ofr being a bit short. The Pokédex seems to say less about Squirtle than some others. Regards, —Celestianpower háblame 22:26, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- How the hell did this pass and Combusken not? Wikipedia is against chickens! :O Highway Rainbow Sneakers 22:28, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure; I didn't review Combusken. -ZeroTalk 04:20, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- I know, but it has about three times as many refs. Highway Rainbow Sneakers 07:15, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Some reviewers are harsher than others, and that's their perogative, I'm afraid. Regards, —Celestianpower háblame 07:36, 12 June 2006 (UTC)