User talk:Springnuts
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Cleaned up page December 2006
Springnuts 10:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Umakant Sharma
Thanks for the heads up on the {{afd}} of the article on Umakant Sharma, it is much appreciated! Hope you have had happy holidays and a happy new year! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 06:54, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
man listen to me i need those articles you understand? (Added by user User:Yabay 17:05, 1 January 2007)
[edit] Bobby Barr
Hi there, generally professional sportspersons are considered notable, for footballers in the UK, teams that are within the top ten tiers of the league system are notable, and therefor most players within those teams. Regards Jcuk 17:15, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Tagging Images
Hi there.
I just wanted to give you a heads up that CSD A# are not criteria for image deletion, they have their own section of the policy. I labeled this image as an orphan instead. Soon, Orphanbot will come around and tag it for deletion after five days. Procedural nonsense, it could be ignore all rules kind of deletion, but this is more of a heads up for later new pages patrolling tagging. Keep up the vigilant hunt, happy editing to you. Teke(talk) 05:02, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- I went ahead and deleted the image, I see it is from a deleted A7 article. Teke(talk) 05:11, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] commons:User:Springnuts
I assert to be the same user as commons:User:Springnuts Springnuts 16:55, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The diff you posted for the commons PotY competition was invalid
Your vote seems to have been struck because the diff was invalid. You might want to try again. ---N Shar (talk • contribs) 02:00, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Template:Doosan Group
Hi Springnuts. I disagree with your A7 tagging of this template for speedy deletion. Doosan Group is clearly notable, and while I agree that User:Mirmo! has created a number of shaky pages, he/she appears to be interested in South Korean corporations in general and any concerns about their edits should probably be taken as good-faith notability problems rather than spamming. If you feel this template is not helpful or have another reason for its deletion, it could be listed at WP:TFD. Cheers, Deiz talk 09:39, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Having looked into this a little further, Mirmo's edits tread a very fine line of notability. However, as there is a wide range of companies featured in his editing, I don't feel he is an outright spammer. I do fully support his block for removing tags. I'll continue to look into these pages, so far I've speedied one and removed a couple of tags as inappropriate, 2 on templates and one from an article with a weak-but-visible claim to notability. I might ask other members of WikiProject Korea to get involved with some of the salvageable pages. Deiz talk 09:52, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thoughtform
Your determination and reversion was unfounded and rash. Thanx 4 the prompt to edit.
Namaste in agape
Walking my talk in beauty
B9 hummingbird hovering (talk • contribs) 06:21, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Survey Invitation
Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 14:11, 15 March 2007 (UTC)talk to me
[edit] Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Regarding notability of Football (soccer) players
Hi, seeing you have been involved in previous Afd debates I invite you to contribute to this discussion to clarify certain issues about football player notability. I think clearer guidelines are needed to avoid repeated inappropriate nominations for deletion and time consuming discussions. Cheers! StephP 17:44, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heretical (website)
Hi, at the AFD for Heretical (website), you commented "merge, redirect not needed", but in your edit summary stated "redirect". Did you mean "redirect, merge not needed"? Would you please clarify your position there? Thank you in advance, Black Falcon 21:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
