User talk:SpikeJones
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot |
|---|---|
| Any sections older than 60 days are automatically archived to User talk:SpikeJones/Archive. Sections without timestamps are not archived. An index of the archives may be found at User talk:SpikeJones/Archive index. |
Contents |
[edit] Spike Jones
Are you, by any chance, a fan of Spike Jones? Or is this just a coincidence? I have been meaning to add to his article, and if you know anything about him, I would love to contribute with someone such as yourself. talk me back if you're interested, mysekurity 6 July 2005 17:50 (UTC)
[edit] New Wikiproject Las Vegas
I have noted your interest in Las Vegas, Nevada and surrounding area. I extend the offer to join us on the Wikiproject Las Vegas. …Guy M… (soapbox) 12:28, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Your Goal of removing Links
Like the User above me you are hell Bent on deleting links to other sites that have more info on the same thing. You Posted a Comment that the Everest Page on this site Everest Page was full of wrong info. How would you know this. I know for a fact 9/10 of this site info comes direct from Disney itself so not sure what is incorrect about it. Do you go around all day finding external links and Deleting them? No ones trying to spam Wikipedia or atleast I'm not. But if I find a site that Kicks but has photos and Videos of the ride and also includes ride audio whats wrong with that. And if you feel the need to kick the links off that is not to a commercial site than the linking feature needs to be turned off
[edit] Disney edits
This article is already full of superfluous junk and is undergoing some pretty stiff criticism about its content which I think is holding it back from where it should be. Like those final lists: Disney in fiction, Disney in Music. And all that unreferenced stuff about the parks development in the 90s. My cursory parousal of this article leaves me wondering about the innovations Dusneyland has brought to theme park entertainment and which don't need to take up that much space.--Magi Media 13:18, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
OK! I looked at this link-to series of articles, and that works for me. What I did was add a little more description at the point where these links first appear without being wordy or redundant.--Magi Media 02:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Magic Castle....?!
What the hell was up with reverting my edit regarding 'Sleeping Beauty's Magic Castle'? Where on earth are you getting the idea that that's what it's called? SergioGeorgini 12:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- I know it's called Sleeping Beauty Castle. I removed the "Magic Castle" thing, I didn't put it there. You put it back! Read before you edit. SergioGeorgini 13:31, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry I started all this. We boomers growing up used to refer to it as the magic castle, and there was a subtitle of Magic Castle at one time. But it's nothing that ever stuck to the books, so in or out, I don't care.--Magi Media 14:16, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Citations
SpikeJones, please pay attention. You removed a 'citation needed' tag because the claim of the sentence was 'well documented'. What you seem to fail to understand however that sources must be cited on Wikipedia. That was and is not the case, and in fact the entire Disneyland article is an enormous failure in that area. The 'citation needed' tag is not in place because the factual accuracy of something is disputed, it is there because something is claimed without a cited source. And there still is no source. SergioGeorgini 19:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
