User talk:Spicynugget

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Spicynugget, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Sophia 07:36, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Is spicynugget a sockpuppet?

I know that I edited wikipedia about 30 times while on vacation and using another computer, so for the record, please understand that those IP addresses I used to contribute content were a one time thing. I am back from vacation now and have access to my regular spicynugget machine. I was transparent the entire time about my identity. I even emailed Jimbo and told him about my ip situation and asked him for help against the blatant vandalism I so regretfully have been the victim of.

This is what he wrote me back: Hi! Complaining to me directly is the last stage in the process, not the first. I recommend that you seek help first from the mediation committee, and if you can not get satisfaction there, turn to the arbitration committee.

That sounds good, so beware, if you remove these links, I will grow old proving to you I am the most stubborn user you have ever come across.

The following pertinent and highly researched links in question:


Other than that, happy editing!Spicynugget 03:08, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mark Andrew Ritchie

Hello there,

Maybe you can help me out here. I have found no evidence that this fellow Mark Andrew Ritchie is an anthropologist, and so I keep reverting you when you add him to List of anthropologists. But maybe I'm wrong. Can you provide some sort of evidence that he is an anthropologist? I notice that he's written books on subjects that anthropologists write about as well, but that alone an anthropologist does not make, I think.--Birdmessenger 18:34, 9 June 2006 (UTC)


Just because you are not aware of him being an anthropologist does not negate his anthropological contributions. Here are is a reference [1] Texas A&M University Department of Anthropology.
Well, again maybe I'm missing something, but nowhere on that page does Mark Andrew Ritchie identify himself as an anthropologist.--Birdmessenger 19:12, 9 June 2006 (UTC)


His book states that he lived among the Yanomamo people and scientifically documented their cultural behaviors.

It does not state that he was an anthropologist.
Also, I noticed that the article you wrote on Ritchie (the bulk of which is a quote from some reviewer on Amazon) misidentifies him as an anthropologist.--Birdmessenger 19:28, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Hello again, please stop adding Mark Andrew Ritchie to List of anthropologists without further discussion. Thanks. --Birdmessenger 15:35, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] God in the Pits

Hi! Do you have some sources for the information in the God in the Pits article? Such as who has banned and what? And why are the Bible, Communist China, and drug smuggling involved in the discussion? Thanks! Weregerbil 07:36, 10 June 2006 (UTC)


Someone please investigate KillerChihuahua's history in reference to the prayer page.Spicynugget 16:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Those links were discussed on the talk page of the article and deemed by consensus to be inappropriate for the article. MamaGeek (Talk/Contrib) 16:40, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] prayer links

Before you re-add the external links to Prayer, please read Wikipedia:External_links#Links_to_normally_avoid. It seems to me that those links would be better avoided given that guideline, but if you think otherwise, maybe you could explain why on Talk:Prayer. Thanks. Wesley 16:34, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

We are approaching a consensus that those links are pertinent.Spicynugget 16:47, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

The only consensus is that the links are spam and should be deleted.Dogface 03:07, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Repeated edits to Prayer

It is suspected that the same user has used the multiple IP addresses and the username SpicyNugget to repeatedly add the same two commercial links to the Prayer article:

This has got to stop!!

[edit] please investigate vandal administrator KillerChihuahua

The following pertinent and highly researched links keep getting removed by birdmessenger. I have been blocked a few times by a rougue administrator that vandalizes by the alias: KillerChihuahua

Someone please investigate KillerChihuahua's history in reference to the prayer page.Spicynugget 18:21, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR

You have gone over 3RR today. I will be reporting you. -- Jeff3000 03:14, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Can you please show me where?Spicynugget 03:18, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Here's the report Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/3RR#User:Spicynugget_reported_by_User:Jeff3000_.28Result:.29, it shows the four reverts today. -- Jeff3000 03:27, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Naconkantari 03:15, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

 You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.

Naconkantari 03:19, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Spam

Stop spamming the Prayer article with links. KillerChihuahua?!? 14:20, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

The same goes for Exclamation mark. [ælfəks] 15:02, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] July 14 3RR

You're on the verge of violating the 3RR on Prayer. -- Jeff3000 18:18, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have continued to edit disruptively on Prayer, re-adding the spamlinks which you have been repeatedly told not to insert. I am blocking you. Please use the time to contemplate whether you wish to be a part of Wikipedia, in which case, follow the policies, or not, in which case, I wish you well in your future endeavors. KillerChihuahua?!? 18:20, 14 July 2006 (UTC)


What was the reason this time?

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: ""

Decline reason: "No reason given for unblock; no reason to unblock"

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.

Note: This edit[2] is vandalism. KillerChihuahua?!? 18:31, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Good, finally I am getting some attention to this matter. I have tried the admin notice board, but KillerChihuahua just shuffled my pleas for help to some backlogs. As a relatively new Wiki user, [3] seemed like the place to go to get some normal admins to deliver justice. Spicynugget 18:37, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

I didn't move the notice. It was archived by a bot. Check the history. KillerChihuahua?!? 20:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Er...Exclamation mark is where the normal admins hang out? Well, learn something new every day. I knew they had to be somewhere. Bishonen | talk 20:49, 16 July 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Need I say more?

Others have obviously had major problems with KillerChihuahua: [KillerChihuahua Blacklisted as Rouge Administrator] Spicynugget 19:24, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

I added myself to that category, after being awarded the Rouge Admin banner by another editor. Why don't you read WP:ROUGE. KillerChihuahua?!? 20:21, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Yo, Spicy! I have my own problems with Killer C, but in this case he is correct. Don't get me wrong, I like a good prayer as much as the next man but you have been spamming the links. Here is an example.
So chill out, and if you need help, ask for it. --Wing Nut 17:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../s/p/i/User_talk%7ESpicynugget_2a6a.html"