Wikipedia talk:Special:Disambiguations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for the special page at Special:Disambiguations.
For general information on this and other special pages, see Help:Special page.
For recent talk about special pages, see Recentchangeslinked/Specialpages discussion


Contents

[edit] Mostly useless

The report at Special:Disambiguations is mostly useless. Use Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links or Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages maintenance instead. Ewlyahoocom 08:17, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] See also


[edit] Comments

A page is treated as dismbiguation

*disambiguation
--Jshadias 01:17, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

How the heck do you remove articles from the disambiguation page once they've been fixed? I can't do a strike because there is not an edit link on the Disambiguation pages article nor on Template:Disambig.--OGRastamon 23:55, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Dont it do it automatically like with double redirects?

Reedy Boy 08:01, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hiding redirects

Is there any way a feature could be added that would allow the hiding of redirects linking to disambiguation pages? This would help greatly when trying to fix article links going to disambiguation pages. Mike5904 02:48, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Refresh?

Could someone please refresh this list? Ewlyahoocom 04:38, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Also, the database query appears to be limited to the first 1000 entries. Is that correct? I can't figure out the sort order on this list but maybe it's still in the A's (or the B's).

 ...
 999. Ryan Gray (Edit) => America
1000. California 1 (Edit) => America

Oh, on a side note right now I'm editing this page at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Special:Disambiguations

the "project page" tab/link up at the top links to:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Special:Disambiguations

which redirects to:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Deadendpages

but I got here from the page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Disambiguations

Ewlyahoocom 18:27, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ignore User talk?

OK, maybe an argument could be made for keeping Talk: in this report, maybe even User:, but User talk: is just useless here, isn't it?

74. User talk:ClaudineChionh (Edit) => Augustine

Ewlyahoocom 08:26, 5 February 2006 (UTC)