Talk:Spellforce 2: Shadow Wars
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Plot needs elaboration
The plot could still use a bit of work. I'll get to it when I get a chance, unless someone else gets to it first. Dr Aaron 03:04, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Bias
"While the Spellforce game series has been one of the few attempts to fuse role-playing game (RPG) and real-time strategy (RTS) elements, Spellforce 2 contains very little else in the way of innovation." is not a neutral sentence and should be edited.
Also, in the reactions section - the original Spellforce was met with pretty equal reactions. I've read several reviews of the game:
GameSpot: 8.2/10 GameZone: 8.4/10 IGN: 8.2/10
Those are just a few and they're actually pretty favorable reviews.
There are several other areas of the article which I also feel are lacking in neutrality, but I'm new at this, so I'm not sure how to word my opinion on why they are. I'm also not comfortable editing the article, so if someone would like to respond to this, or edit the article, it would be appreciated.--IndigoAK 06:13, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- I've edited the offending statements. I'd argue that they weren't "biased" but rather "incorrect". Dr Aaron 15:37, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] the link
Spellforce: The Order of Dawn should be a link to Spellforce: 'The Order of Dawn' not the 'spellforce' series User:Tikai 14:04, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- No, the Spellforce page does refer to the Spellforce: the Order of the Dawn release. It is poorly named and mostly a stubb, but I don't have enough experience with the original game to do a good page. I've been thinking about moving it, but I don't feel comfortable doing that until I have the time to fix it properly. Dr Aaron 00:37, 30 July 2006 (UTC)