Talk:South Indian culture
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
|
More information about this article...
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dravidian civilizations, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of now-defunct states. If you would like to participate, visit the project page to join. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. (FAQ). Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
|
|
WP Former Countries - Things to do:
|
||
[edit] Weltanpushing
This article is nothing but an attempt in popularising this diabolical term.Bharatveer 13:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Caldwell
Caldwell's "A comparative grammar of the Dravidian or South-Indian family of languages" deals with the languages families of south India. His claim was that the south Indian languages were different from the north Indian, and hence that the south Indians were culturally different from the north. He never claimed that the south Indians were genetically different from the north Indians. User:Bharatveer's proof for claiming Caldwell was "erroneous" is a reference from the The Hindu news paper article dealing with the genetic makeup of India. It is therefore irrelevant to the article in the context. - Parthi talk/contribs 20:12, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- Parthy, That it is irrelevant is just your opinion .-Bharatveer 04:16, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- I don't understand! The Hindu article is about the genetic makeup of India. It is not my opinion. It is there in black and white. Caldwell did not say south Indians were genetically different. Don't start another revert war Bhartveer. Don't blindly revert as you usually do. - Parthi talk/contribs 05:43, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
-
