Talk:Source Four

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

125px This article is part of Wikipedia's Stagecraft coverage, and has come to the attention of WikiProject Stagecraft, an attempt to create a comprehensive and detailed resource on the art of stagecraft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (just like any other article!), or visit WikiProject Stagecraft, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.


It's a start JWGreen 04:07, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

I am tempted to add the {{context}}tag, because I, not being a layman, have no idea what a borosilicate reflector is. I know that a S4 has a glass reflector which is what the borosilicate is, I belive. And yes I rocognize that you made this in two hours. So basically, let's dumb it down a bit and make it a bit less of an advertisement, b/c WP won't like that. I don't mind, b/c the S4 is great. KeepOnTruckin 18:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

I added citation, but I don't know if I did it correctly. I added a citation everywhere [citation needed] was. I also corrected the link to colour gels, becase the anglican spelling didn't link correctly. -JWGreen 18:33, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Bench Focus

I've never heard it called this before, anyone have any ideas? -JWGreen 21:55, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

I call it bench focusing all the time. It's a pretty common term. --Lekogm 22:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Common in northwest America at least. 48v 02:17, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Its common in the world of theater, not just the northwestern part of America. || Airbornecasualty 15:48, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] EDLT

I can get a photo soon of the EDLT -JWGreen 02:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stub?

Is this really still a stub? Looks pretty good to me. Bryson430 18:29, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Change of Structure

Right now I have Source Four Ellipsoidal redirecting here. I suggest however that we move this page's information to that page and write an overview of the Fource Four Range here. This way, the structure of the source four articles goes like this:

--Wforlines 16:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Your thoughts?

[edit] One more thing...

Shouldn't it be Source Four? I know if we said Lighting Instrument, it should be Lighting instrument, but this being a brand name like Compaq Presario (it was he first thing I saw when I looked up), I think the Four should be capitalized. --Wforlines 16:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../s/o/u/Talk%7ESource_Four_3efc.html"