From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics. |
??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ] |
??? |
This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics. |
Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
|
|
This article is supported by the Soil WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage on Soil and related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the articles of high importance on the project worklist, or visit the project page for more details on the project.
|
Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Soil WikiProject assessment scale. [FAQ] See comments here. |
|
Soil moisture is included in the 2006 Wikipedia CD Selection, or is a candidate for inclusion in the next version. Please maintain high quality standards and, if possible, stick to GFDL-compatible images. |
These articles are very similar, and would make a bit more sense to have in a single article. Probably the most confusing question is which article name should be kept. +mwtoews 04:48, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
On this soil moisture talk, I can't agree with the "merge" idea. Naturally if a term is really "rare" then it would be better to merge it with another rare term. Is "soil moisture" a rare term? May be, may be not, depending on if your work touches on it. In my work, "water content" can cover a great deal, while "soil moisture" covers not that much but still a lot. Therefore, even if I consider merging I wouldn't merge these two terms.