Soil crust
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In more arid regions, vegetative cover is generally sparse. Open spaces are usually covered by a biological soil crust, a highly specialized community of cyanobacteria, mosses, and lichen. Biological soil crusts are commonly found in semiarid and arid environments throughout the world. Areas in the United States where crusts are a prominent feature of the landscape include the Great Basin, Colorado Plateau, Sonoran Desert, and the inner Columbia Basin. Crusts are also found in agricultural areas, native prairies, and Alaska. Outside the United States, crusts have been studied in the Antarctic, Australia, and Israel, among other locations. In fact, microbiotic crusts have been found on all continents and in most habitats, leaving few areas crust-free.
Contents |
[edit] What is the right name?
Biological soil crusts are also known as cryptogamic, microbiotic, microphytic, and cryptobiotic, leading to some confusion. The names are all meant to indicate common features of the organisms that compose the crusts. The most inclusive term is probably biological soil crust, as this distinguishes them from physical crusts while not limiting crust components to plants. Whatever name used, there remains an important distinction between these formations and physical or chemical crusts.
Biological soil crusts are formed by living organisms and their by-products, creating a crust of soil particles bound together by organic materials.
Chemical and physical crusts are inorganic features such as a salt crust or platy surface crust, often formed by trampling.
[edit] Structure and formation
Biological soil crusts are formed by living organisms and their by-products, creating a surface crust of soil particles bound together by organic materials. Aboveground crust thickness can reach up to 10 cm. Crusts are predominantly composed of cyanobacteria (formerly known as blue-green algae), green and brown algae, mosses, and lichens. Liverworts, fungi, and bacteria can also be important components. The general appearance of the crusts in terms of color, surface topography, and surficial coverage varies. Mature crusts of the Great Basin and Colorado Plateau are usually darker than the surrounding soil. This color is due in part to the density of the organisms and to the often dark color of the cyanobacteria, lichens, and mosses. Crusts generally cover all soil spaces not occupied by vascular plants, which may be 70% or more of the living cover.
These soil crusts are characterized by their marked increase in surface topography, often referred to as pinnacles or pedicles. The process of creating surface topography, or pinnacling, is due largely to the presence of filamentous cyanobacteria and green algae. These organisms swell when wet, migrating out of their sheaths. After each migration new sheath material is exuded, thus extending sheath length. Repeated swelling leaves a complex network of empty sheath material that maintains soil structure after the organisms have dehydrated and decreased in size. Frost heaving, subsequent uneven erosion, and lack of surface plant roots results in high pedicles. In the Sonoran, Mojave, and Chihuahuan deserts lack of frost heaving has been used to explain the absence of pinnacles in warmer regions. In northern deserts, where most rain falls in the winter and surface plant roots are plentiful, crusts are generally rolling or smooth.
Soil crusts are important members of desert ecosystems and contribute to the well-being of other plants by stabilizing sand and dirt, promoting moisture retention, and fixing atmospheric nitrogen. Because of their thin, fiberous nature, cryptobiotic soils are extremely fragile systems. A single footprint or tire track is sufficient to disrupt the soil crust and damage the organisms. While some species within the soil crust system may regrow within a few years of a disturbance, the damage to slow-growing species may require more than a century before the delicate soil returns to its former productivity. This sensitivity to disturbance means that travelers in arid regions should be mindful of their impact on cryptobiotic soils. As a general rule, visitors should stay on pre-existing roads and trails, only traveling off-trail on durable surfaces such as bedrock or river gravel.
In the Great Basin and the Colorado Plateau, Microcolues vaginatus (a cyanobacteria) composes the vast majority of the crust structure. Lichens of the genus Collema spp. and mosses from the genus Tortula spp. are common. In hot deserts, such as the Sonoran, other cyanobacteria are more common. Some more acidic soils are dominated by green algae. Shifts between green algal and cyanobacterial dominance have been attributed to changes in pH, with the decreasing alkalinity (pH) favoring green algae. More stable crusts are dominated by lichens and/or mosses. The organism that dominates the crust is partly determined by microclimate and may also represent different successional stages.
[edit] Ecological functions
Crusts contribute to a number of functions in the environment. Because they are concentrated in the top 1 to 4 mm of soil, they primarily effect processes that occur at the land surface or soil-air interface. These include soil stability and erosion, atmospheric N-fixation, nutrient contributions to plants, soil-plant-water relations, infiltration, seedling germination, and plant growth.
[edit] Soil stability
Crust-forming cyanobacteria have filamentous growth forms that bind soil particles. These filaments exude sticky polysaccharide sheaths around their cells that aid in soil aggregation by cementing particles together. Fungi, both free-living and as a part of lichens, contribute to soil stability by binding soil particles with hyphae. Lichens and mosses assist in soil stability by binding particles with rhizines/rhizoids, increasing resistance to wind and water action. The increased surface topography of some crusts, along with increased aggregate stability, further improves resistance to wind and water erosion.
[edit] Water infiltration
Crusts can alter water infiltration. Studies where crusts greatly increase surface roughness generally have increased infiltration with the presence of crusts. Where crusts do not significantly increase surface roughness, infiltration is generally reduced due to the presence of cyanobacterial filaments. Differences in findings are therefore site specific and also related to soil texture and chemical properties of the soil.
[edit] Effects on plant germination and growth
Studies investigating the role of crusts in plant germination have had varied results. Increased surface relief is presumed to provide safe sites for seeds while darker surface color increases soil temperatures to those required for germination earlier in the season, coinciding with spring water availability.
Large-seeded plants often require burial for germination. Native seeds have self-drilling mechanisms or are cached by rodents. However, soil crusts reduce soil movement, and this may limit passive burial and germination of large-seeded exotic plants like Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass or drooping brome or downy brome).
Studies on plant health are clear-cut. Many studies have shown increases in survival and/or nutrient content in crust covered environments as opposed to bare soil. Nutrients shown to increase in plant tissues grown in the presence of crusts are nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, iron, calcium, magnesium, and manganese. Some of the plants benefited by crust presence include Festuca octoflora (sixweeks fescue), Mentzelia multiflora (desert blazing star), Arabis fecunda (rock-cress), Kochia prostrata (prostrate summercypress), Linum perenne (blue flax), Lepidium montanum (mountain peppergrass), and Sphaeralcea coccinea (scarlet globemallow).
[edit] Response to disturbance
Crusts are well adapted to severe growing conditions, but poorly adapted to compressional disturbances. Domestic livestock grazing, and more recently, tourist activities (hiking, biking, and ORV's) and military activities place a heavy toll on the integrity of the crusts. Disruption of the crusts brings decreased organism diversity, soil nutrients, stability, and organic matter.
Direct damage to crusts usually comes in the form of trampling by humans and livestock or vehicles driving off of roads. Compressional disturbances break sheaths and filaments and drastically reduces the capability of the soil organisms to function, particularly in providing nitrogen and soil stability. Changes in plant composition are often used as indicators of range health. This indicator may not be sensitive enough to warn of damage to microbiotic crusts. Studies of trampling disturbance have noted that losses of moss cover, lichen cover, and cyanobacterial presence can be severe (1/10, 1/3, and 1/2 respectively), runoff can increase by half, and the rate of soil loss can increase six times without apparent damage to vegetation. Disturbance to soil surfaces in arid regions can lead to large soil losses.
Other disturbance impacts are indirect. Several native rangeland shrubs (Artemisia tridentata, Atriplex confertifolia, and Ceratoides lanata) may have allelopathic effects on the nitrogen fixing capabilities of crusts, potentially lowering nitrogen fixation by 80 percent. Actions that increase the shrub component, such as excessive grazing, can have an unexpected impact on crust functioning.
Another indirect disturbance occurs through crust burial. When the integrity of the crust is broken through trampling or other means, the soil is more susceptible to wind and water erosion. This soil can be moved long distances, covering intact crusts. Crusts tolerate shallow burial by extending sheaths to the surface to begin photosynthesis again. Deeper burial by eroded sediment will kill crusts.
Fire is a common component of many regions where microbiotic crusts grow. Investigations into the effects of fire on crusts show that fires can cause severe damage, but that recovery is possible. The degree to which crusts are damaged by fires apparently depends on the intensity of the fire. Low intensity fires do not remove all the structure of the crust, allowing for regrowth without significant soil loss. Shrub presence (particularly sagebrush) increases the intensity of the fire, decreasing the likelihood of early vegetative or crust recovery.
Full recovery of crusts from disturbances is a slow process, particularly for mosses and lichens. There are means to facilitate recovery. Allowing the cyanobacterial and green algae component to recover will give the appearance of a healthy crust. This visual recovery can be complete in as little as 1 to 5 years given average climate conditions. However, crust thickness can take up to 50 years, and mosses and lichens can take up to 250 years to recover. Limiting the size of the disturbed area also increases the rate of recovery, provided that there is a nearby source of inoculum.
[edit] Future research
The land where crusts occur is used for a wide range of purposes--from grazing and recreation to military uses, and in some places, crops. Ultimately, land managers need to know how the functions of crusts change under different practices. Where the functions of crusts are impaired or eliminated because of land use practices, and are essential to the health of the ecosystem, land managers need guidelines to adapt their practices to protect or restore the functions of crusts.
[edit] References
- Introduction to Biological Soil Crusts [1] by USGS Canyonlands Research Station.
- Biological soil crusts, USGS Canyonlands Research Station
- Cryptobiotic soils, USGS
