Talk:Society for the Promotion of Community Standards

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This seems to be mostly original research and biased.

  • "The Society regularly issues media releases of considerable length, few of which appear to be picked up by the New Zealand media." - most news releases by organisations are not picked up by the media!
  • "On the basis of its actions, it appears this group is largely concerned with criticising the decisions of the Office of Film and Literature Classification (New Zealand) and the current Chief Censor, Bill Hastings, seemingly on the basis that he is gay." - it either is or isn't largely concerned with criticising the decision of the OFLC, and Bill Hastings. Seemingly? Provide a source please.

The article might be short, but it's got problems. - Ta bu shi da yu 13:41, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

The current version (as at 5 Feb 06) is equally biased, and has erased all analysis of the actions of the Society. I'm not interested in engaging in an edit war - perhaps someone else might like to have a go at a 'balanced' entry? Fastred 5 Feb 2006

Yup, none too good. I know virtually nothing about the group, I just know the writing style was none too good when I saw it. - Ta bu shi da yu 22:27, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Looks wikified and neutral now.