Talk:Sobhuza I of Swaziland

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ]
(If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
This article is supported by the Royalty and nobility work group.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Requested move

Ngwane IV of SwazilandSobhuza I of Swaziland – An expert has been so kind to inform me that this monarch - who is known by two names - is much better known as Sobhuza I. (For more information, see the article.) Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 19:53, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Survey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move. Andrewa 03:23, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

  • Support as nominator. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 19:54, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Support --Polaron | Talk 20:50, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Support. --Usgnus 20:52, 25 August 2006 (UTC)"
  • Support If anyone wants citations, ask on my talk page. Ngwe 04:20, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

[edit] Discussion

Is this a controversial move? If not, it might be easier to just move the article yourself rather than go through the Requested Moves process. --Polaron | Talk 20:05, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

It is not controversial at all, but since the destination is already occupied by a redirect (which has been updated once), it requires an administrator to move the page. Since I am not, I have no choice but to use this method. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 20:29, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
I have removed the page history on the redirect so now anyone can move it. --Henrygb 14:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
I have moved the page. Ngwe 22:56, 29 August 2006 (UTC)