Talk:Snooker commentary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Votes for deletion

03:14, 31 August 2006: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snooker commentary . Oucome: kept. `'mikka (t) 17:08, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Exact commentary occurrences

I have written some of the paragraphs in this article according to memory and discussions with people I have met. I think it could really do with the input of others, such as if anyone can also remember when a commentator made a certain statement for which I have no exact reference. It is not something that can be easily looked up!

There is encoded discussion within the editable text in the "Commentating gaffes" section as well as the "Scandals" section. The scandal section is a light-hearted take on things, but may be a candidate for removal altogether, although I think some of the issues in there are poignant regarding the subject matter. Kris 16:27, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Unfortunately wikipedia has a number of seriously taken policies: wikipedia:Verifiability, No original research and the related guidelines: Wikipedia:Citing sources, Wikipedia:Reliable sources. The reson is very simple: since anyone can edit wikipedia, even anonymously wikipedia does not have any ways to verify the correctness of information but references to reputable sources. Therefore unfortunately a significant part of this interesting article will be deleted, if it will not be supported by quotations. `'mikka (t) 17:08, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

• Tagged for WP:NOR and lack of WP:V. I'll give the author a week or so to source this, but after that anything unsourced will be removed.--Isotope23 02:26, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Per my comments above I took out the most glaring examples of original research as nobody bothered to source this article in the last month and a half. The rest of the article still needs to be verified.--Isotope23 21:47, 2 November 2006 (UTC)