User talk:Smart-pari

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Sibiraj

The article Sibiraj has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Merope 16:15, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:200px-Trisha.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:200px-Trisha.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Yamla 04:27, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Anushka-08.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Anushka-08.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Trisha Krishnan, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Yamla 03:41, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked for your continued violation of Wikipedia image copyright and fair-use policies. Please refrain from uploading any more such images once your block expires. --Yamla 03:43, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

hey I'm a new comer so can u unblock it

hello are you there can you ublock it thanks coz I don't think is fair coz I have been contributing to wikipedia so much in a short period of time but if you don't want to unblock the thing then i's alright. Then I on't want to be a member of wikipedia no more coz I've got better things to do so it's up to you yamla.

THANK YOU !

[edit] Deletion

A tag has been placed on Sameer Aftab, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NickelShoe (Talk) 20:47, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

==Speedy deletion of Muktha Elsa George==

A tag has been placed on Muktha Elsa George, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Non-notable

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ≈ The Haunted Angel (The Forest Whispers My Name) 18:42, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Bhanu.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bhanu.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:06, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Tamanna-10.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tamanna-10.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:22, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Muktha.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Muktha.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:12, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Achanurangatha Veedu

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Achanurangatha Veedu, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria.

Sorry this is late, I totally forgot! Veesicle (Talk) (Contribs) 23:34, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyrights

Please do not upload copyrighted images. Images that are obviously copyright violations will be deleted on sight. In order for Wikipedia to use an image, it must either be released by its owner under a "free" license (such as the GFDL), meaning, one that allows anyone to use the image for any reason, or it must be used under a claim of fair use. Most images that you would find on some website are NOT appropriate to use on Wikipedia. Thank you. --BigDT 17:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Trisha Krishnan

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Trisha Krishnan, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ×Meegs 17:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Please also only create Interlanguage links to other Wikipedias if they currently have an article about the same topic. If the article does exist on another Wikipedia, be sure to give it's name after the colon inside the link. ×Meegs 17:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked again

You have been warned, blocked, and now warned several more times about uploading unfree copyrighted images that are not compatible with Wikipedia. I have just deleted your two most recent uploads (of Priyamani and Mallika Kapoor), both of which you had previously uploaded with different licensing information. Image copyright is not a guessing game; you must not specify that an image available under a particular license (such as the GFDL) unless you are certain that that is the case. Only the owner of an photograph, usually the photographer or the company that they work for, is able to decide how to license the image. If they do not specify otherwise, they retain all rights to their work. We rarely allow such unfree copyrighted works in Wikipedia, and we never allow them when their only purpose is to show a living, active actor. Do not upload any additional images until you have thoroughly read each of the following pages:

I have blocked you for two days. That should be adequate time for you to begin to read about and understand the basics of copyright and Wikipedia policies. Even so, given your long history, I strongly suggest that when you return that you only upload images that you have created yourself. For photographs, that means images that you have taken with the camera in your own hands. If you misrepresent the copyright status of any additional images in the future, you will likely be blocked for a period of weeks or months. 18:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../s/m/a/User_talk%7ESmart-pari_95aa.html"