Talk:Sly 3: Honor Among Thieves
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Removal from bosses section
The removal of content was due to the fact that I was unable to find any information in regard to those particular entries into that section. If you wish to replace them, please be so kind as to give me a link to where I can find information that will verify those entries as legitimate. --Chanting Fox 17:27, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks to a little work (and the fact that a certain video has been made downloadable to Gamespot Basic users), I was able to confirm one of the three bosses that were added by the anon. user as legitimate. However, the other two were not. In one case, there wasn't enough information to verify whether that boss actually fulfilled the requirements for being a boss, and the other appears to be the result of a misunderstanding. It appears that the "magician lion" is in reality either Muggshot the Bulldog (doubtful) or "The Shaman" (highly probable). --Chanting Fox 15:13, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Cleaned up
I made some changes to the Sly 3 page. (Mostly correcting tenses) Others need to clean it up though.
[edit] Cleanup Update
There have been significant changes made overall, including total tenses update and the compression of the lengthy introduction. Also, the plot has been added. I personally believe that tthis page is ready to be taken off the "cleanup" list. If there is anything anyone believes should be added/deleted, please do so now. CryptoStorm 16:58, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Being bold.
I'm going to clean this up, and add a couple sections (Gameplay and Plot). Oh yeah, adding features. Abby724 18:26, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Added Skills
I felt the article needed more descriptions of the skills required in the game; safe cracking, plane flying, disguises etc. So I added them! This is my first ever edit, so sorry if its not up to scratch. Surlysearle 17:02, 21 August 2006 (UTC)Surlysearle
[edit] Tone of article
Some of the article doesn't sound encyclopedic, and also, Wikipedia shouldn't have original research. You know, no "judging by" sort of things. Abby724 05:23, 1 October 2006 (UTC)