User talk:Sloth monkey
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
U:SM / U:SM:SO / U:SM:CW - L - A:RK / A:FOL / A:J - UT:SM / 1 || U:WJ - UT:WJ || W:A || FOL - T:FOL - FOL:H
Contents |
[edit] User comments
Sloth Monkey,
I just learned of certain challanges to the Phil Schneider entry that were posted about a month ago. Do you want to address any corrections that might be appropriate, or should I? Thanks, LuciusMichael
[edit] ORME
Please see User talk:OlavN. -- RHaworth 13:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] wooooah!!!
dyude!, u sew tootally wobbed mall dis von dah perple, bewk dat vis at dah barnes! but seriousley!, who ever bought yew dah bewk me wauld mailith dem a double chilli cheese berger von HARD-E!s yep yep yep yep yep yep yep yep yep yep yep NONDE DESKA!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.56.145.36 (talk) 01:30, 24 February 2007 (UTC).
[edit] PMIDs
Please do not remove PubMed IDs from articles, as you did with DNA these are a useful part of references. TimVickers 15:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- That was a misunderstanding. An editing conflict occured and erased changes that I was oblivious to. Just trying to make a minor change. Linked some words to wiki articles. sloth_monkey 06:32, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:United States Of Europe Poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:United States Of Europe Poster.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:07, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wassup d00d
Hi User:Sloth monkey, I noticed you archived an interesting article relating to the so-called Flower of Life geometric pattern. You will undoubtedly be cognisant of the connection between that geometric pattern and the Time Cube 4-corner creation principle.
May I enquire: do you approve of the notorious and persistent censorship and suppression of the 4-corner harmonic Cubic truth that has occurred within the scope of the Time Cube article and other related articles, on a nearly-continuous basis since late 2003? More Wikipedians should revolt against the Cubeless tyranny that enslaves this website. Do you think that Jimbo Wales might be a 1-corner Cube-hating singularity overlord?
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 211.28.8.20 (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2007 (UTC). —User identified as Suring!
- who are you? i immediate suspicion is that you are suring. ..however your message was much more coherent than normal suring ramblings. but i suspect this may be a ploy by the devious suring to deceive me. ...your IP resolves to sunax7-b020.dialup.optusnet.com.au, which I believe means you're using a dialup connection in australia. ........WHO ARE YOU!?! ps. Yes. I think that Jimbo Wales might be a 1-corner Cube-hating singularity overlord. sloth_monkey 20:24, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Sloth monkey, no I am not acquainted nor associated with this "Suring" character to whom you refer--but in fact, I am a proponent of NATURE'S HARMONIC TIME CUBE principle, expounded on such websites as TimeCube.com and CubicAO.tk.
- Yes I think we should probably be suspicious of Jimbo Wales. Perhaps he has had a hand in the anti-Cubic conspiracies that have arisen on this site. And indeed, Nature's Harmonic Time Cube is the key, the agent and the pathway that shall lead us to human salvation.
-
-
- You're so full of it. crazy suring bastard. sloth_monkey 21:00, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
-