User:Sloth monkey/contributions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

L - U:SM / SM:SO / SM:C - A:RK / A:FOL / A:J - UT:SM / 1 || U:WJ - UT:WJ || W:A || FOL - T:FOL - FOL:H

mark of the monkey
mark of the monkey
the sloth_monkey

THE SLOTH_MONKEY!


[edit] Some of my contributions to Wikipedia

I HATH CREATED THE MOST ULTIMATE COMPLETE SEMI-EROTIC GUIDE TO ROBERT KIYOSAKI!! GAZE UPON IT WITH AWE AND WONDER!! ...That is to say, I was the one who created the VAST majority of the Wiki bio of the saki man. .......I actually went to the extent of creating a secondary article concerning 'The Teachings of Robert Kiyosaki', which contained a large amount of things which I learned while exploring his educational/motivational material. One should note however that after I poured a ridiculous amount of time and effort into filling Wikipedia with all of this... the article was deleted! Why? Because Wikipedia is run by the common man who can arbitrarily decide what is and isn't "suitable" content for Wikipedia, given their personal bias or power trip. I understand this knid of thing must be a difficult issue to avoid given the element of user-generated content, but it sure pisses me off when I spent so much time on an article only to have it all for nothing. What a load of shit.

I wrote a good portion of the article on Aedra, which is a type of creature from the video game world of The Elder Scrolls. Preeeetty friggen nerdy, eh?

I created the article on Trojan.Emcodec.E, a trojan malware piece of poo that eats the souls of unsuspecting computer users. In this way, I am saving the world. For I am an educational hero to the victims of Trojan.Emcodec.E! ...Please, hold the applause.

I wrote most of the article on Phil Schneider, after watching his lecture videos where he told people how he worked for the government and encountered aliens and yadda yadda blah. It's probably a load of crap, but still interesting enough. Afterall, it appears he was murdered for saying what he said, "leeking information" and uncovering conspiracies. ...But don't paint me crazy just for listening to it. I didn't say I was a believer. I just.. consider it possible.

I added a buncha crap to the article on firecrackers. My family owns Uncle Sam Fireworks, so I tend to know things about fireworks.

I put a lotta work into this. Basically I wrote the article on the Flower of Life from scratch. When I got there it was a smelly little stub.

Take a look at this history snapshot of BEFORE I arrived at the article and AFTER. Pretty much everything you see added to it was all done by myself. Look at the ridiculous reference list -over 100 sources cited! Note that the "after" shot there isn't a live, current version of the article. To see the current article, go here.

I've added a 'conspiracy theories' section to the article on the Eye of Providence. Symbolically, this "all-seeing eye" is said to represent any of the following.

I've adding sections to the article of the fasces, including a 'conspiracy theories' section. The fasces is a symbol which represents either fascism or strength through unity, and is symbolically linked to many conspiracy theories.

I wrote a buncha crap about mind control in the context of conspiracy theories.

I added the New Age/Esoteric Star Tetrahedron MerKaBa section to the article. It's not a very complete explanation of the subject though. I would like to see this subject have its own full blown article, as I beleive it deserves it.

I beautified Enlightenment (concept) with pictures of nelumbo nucifera (lotus flowers).

I beautified Nelumbo nucifera with pictures. Nelumbo nucifera = lotus flower. ...Then of course some jackass deleted the pictures. Well that's okay, it's only the 50th time that sort of thing has happened to me. Now when we hit shfifty-five, maybe I'll start to lose my cool. But for now that's just great.

I created the article on the Bellatricians, a supposed reptilian race of aliens that are spoken of in conspiracy theories.

I added a little to the article on Baphomet (commonly seen as the devil), in reference to Aleister Crowley.

I created the article Automath as a redirection to Autodidacticism.

Strangely, the article didn't mention a word about the term tetragrammaton in reference to Rosicrucianism. heh. Well I fixed that! Cuz I gots me the good ol' Rosicrucian Manual of the Ancient and Mystic Order Rosæ Crucis (AMORC). Hooray for downloading things for free on bittorrent! Oh also I should mention that in this article I just happened to stumble upon AnonMoos being a jackass again. I can't believe this guy. Not only was he pissing other people off at that article there already, but once I got there and contributed something useful (in my opinion very important), he went and did the same thing he'd done at the Flower of Life and completely deleted everything I had wrote. I'm amazed this guy hasn't been banned from Wikipedia yet.

I created the Etymology section, giving a bunch of information on the being Jota, a supposed ideologue of the Freemasons.

I added a mention of Jota in reference to Freemasonry.

I reworded a buncha junk to be NPOV in the Aura (paranormal) article.

[edit] Deleted articles

These are articles which I have created or contributed to and had all or most of what I contribued deleted by others. It annoyingly feeds the part of me that has a problem with Wikipedia and even democracy. ...Don't get me wrong, I like Wikipedia as a resource to learn things. And I like writing articles both to contribute and share, and more importantly for myself, to help organize my thoughts on the subject, as well as remember it better. It also gives me a reference to refer to at a later date. ....But gee it sure is a pain in the ass when it ALL gets deleted by a bunch of fucking dickheads who arbitrarily get to decide what information is presented based on their own foolish biased opinions. Fucking Wikipedia.

  • Robert Kiyosaki's Teachings

More than any other article, I contributed the most to this one. I spent day after day for weeks learning from whatever Robert Kiyosaki had to say; all from downloaded material I got on bittorrent. I didn't do it for Wikipedia, I did it for myself, to learn the material. And I did learn a lot. ..But it sure did piss me off to have such a huge article I wrote all deleted.

This is the second article I spent the most time on. I brought it from a shitty uninformative pathetic excuse of an article (a stub) to a ginormous, amazing wealth of information. Then this retarded AnonMoos guy came along and began constantly reverting ALL the shit I wrote back to its original form. Ridiculous. Jason took a look at what was going on and read some of the things he said and concluded that he must be mentally deficient. I'd like to see him banned from Wikipedia. But whatever. I'm not sure if I really care enough to dick around with all that shit anymore.

  • Alien stuff

Draconians (conspiracy theories) I created the article on the Draconians (conspiracy theories), a supposed group of aliens that are spoken of in conspiracy theories, as well as the Galactic Federation of Light, a supposed organization of aliens. These ideas are presented seriously by various sources, I cited the sources, and I presented the information as allegations and beliefs; not as fact. Apparently users who don't like listening to 'crackpot' theories can decide to deprive others from reading about it. Nice.

  • Monatomic elements and ORMEs

I was incredibly excited about this topic and was proud to be the first to bring it to Wikipedia. However within minutes of posting it, somebody came along and marked it as an article for deletion based entirely on the fact that they were skeptical of the information presented. And by skeptical I mean skepticism based on zero evidence presented to the contrary. Then some more fools came along and said they agreed. I debated a little and then said fine I don't care, do what you will. Hence the article was deleted. For the record, I did cite my sources and I presented the information properly. And I am still exstatic about the topic. I simply decided I didn't want to fight for its presense on Wikipedia. I have various reasons for that, and I'd rather not get into it.

I added some crap about Jota to the article on Freemasonry and immediately had it deleted. I was expecting as much, being that there are swarms of freemasons monitoring the article and don't allow for anything exceptionally incriminating to show up there. In my opinion it only adds to their suspiciousness. ...Jota was purportedly a "spiritual entity" spoken of in scriptures written on Freemasonry, as well as presented by a Historian in a video I watched. Jota supposedly gave knowledge to the "hidden masters" of Freemasonry, which may or may not exist. I presented this all as theoretical allegations, citing sources. ...Note that I also added a mention of this in the article Jota, as well as the etymology section (featuring Jota/Joda/Juda) of the article on Yoda. Yes, Yoda as in Star Wars. I later created the article Jota (Freemasonry), after it was deleted from the main Freemasonry article. Then I even put links to it in the Joda and Juda articles, as well as back at the main Freemasonry article. Those bastards. THEN that article was quickly nominated for speedy deletion. ...I'm really getting sick of this.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../s/l/o/User%7ESloth_monkey_contributions_1c2b.html"