User:SkierRMH/Diocese Infobox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] MamaGeek's suggested revision, feel free to edit
| Diocese of Oakland | |
|---|---|
| Diocesis Queropolitana | |
| Personnel | |
| Bishop | Allen Henry Vigneron |
| Retired Bishops | 1 |
| Total Diocesan Priests | 194 |
| Religious Priests | 98 |
| Permanent Deacons | 92 |
| Religious Brothers | 56 |
| Religious Sisters | 360 |
| Geography | |
| Region | Alameda County and Contra Costa County, San Francisco Bay Area, Northern California, United States |
| Cathedral | Cathedral of Christ the Light (under construction) |
| Parishes | |
| Total Parishes | 85 |
| Missions | 2 |
| Pastoral Centers | 2 |
| Welfare and Education | |
| Catholic Hospitals | 1 |
| Homes for the Aged | 2 |
| Day Care Centers | 5 |
| Specialized Homes | 7 |
| Social Service Centers | 3 |
| Other Institutions | 4 |
| Diocesan Seminarians | 17 |
| Colleges and Universities | 4 |
| High Schools | 9 |
| Elementary Schools | 51 |
| Religious Education/Catechesis | 1 |
| Vital Statistics | |
| Infant Baptisms | 9,373 |
| Adult Baptisms | 472 |
| Received into Full Communion | 619 |
| First Communions | 8,203 |
| Confirmations | 3,345 |
| Total Marriages | 1,338 |
| Deaths/Funerals | 2,663 |
| Total Catholic Population | 450,934 |
| Total Population | 2,464,668 |
I've placed a suggested shorter infobox below the first, but I can't get a section header in the right place. Argyriou (talk) 16:44, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
| Diocese of Oakland | |
|---|---|
| Diocesis Queropolitana | |
| Personnel | |
| Bishop | Allen Henry Vigneron |
| Total Diocesan Priests | 194 |
| Permanent Deacons | 92 |
| Religious Brothers & Sisters | 416 |
| Geography | |
| Location | Alameda County and Contra Costa County, California, United States |
| Cathedral | Cathedral of Christ the Light (under construction) |
| Vital Statistics | |
| Total Parishes | 85 |
| Total Catholic Population | 450,934 |
| Total Population | 2,464,668 |
Either one would be useful -- my only concern about the longer version is that it could easily be longer than the article itself. Perhaps the additional information should be in one section of the body of the article. But there really isn't anything wrong with either one.ClaudeMuncey 21:48, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
