Talk:Sinaia lead plates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

plan of the stonehenge site This article is part of WikiProject Archaeology, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

- I read a lot about Sinaia lead plates these days, and all I can say is that I'm a bit confused... Is there anybody out there able to establish once and for all what is all about? The mixed filling that I have, is that if proven to be real as [http://www.dacia.org does, that can change the whole antique history, with huge negative consequences for many of the nations considered to be the creators of civilizations in Europe. It will go so far that cultures must be re-writing, religions and churches could be in a big decline, and of course, why not, a huge opportunity for the antiquity hunters to show their teeth... It is a duty for the historians to clarify this in the interest of knowing the truth, no matter if painful... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by D21roman (talk • contribs) 16:48, 16 November 2005.

No worries. The tablets are surely fake, so they will not revolutionize history. Alexander 007 18:27, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
I looked a bit at this book in a bookstore. It's awful! I never saw any other linguistics book that is so far off. The author is absolutely clueless. :-) bogdan 21:20, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
However, it would be cool to have the full text of the plates at wikisource. They're interesting from the artistic point of view, for being a 19th century constructed language. :-) bogdan 21:20, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

for romanian nativ speakers, or advanced romanian speakers, i urge you to check out the article in romanian. it is still "under construction" but i think there are a few things there worth translating. (i started the article and brought the most contributions to it. i'm still working on it, and have, thus, not much time to spare for the english version)IleanaCosanziana 23:45, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm not going to start an edit war, but the Romanian article is POV to say the least.Plinul cel tanar 15:43, 5 April 2007 (UTC)