User talk:Shoessss
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot |
|---|---|
| Any sections older than 3 days are automatically archived to User talk:Shoessss/Archive Mar 2007. Sections without timestamps are not archived. An index of the archives may be found at User talk:Shoessss/Archive index. |
Contents |
[edit] Thanks you for the welcome message
Dear Shoeness
Thank you for your welcome message. Very yellow. I am very much in the foothills of understanding how this thing works, but am in principal enthusiastic about the concept. And I think I may be making very slow progress in understanding just a very few of the more intricate 'whys' and (even, though this seems likely to take a little bit longer) 'hows'. I am sure the links you provided will help hasten the necessary learning tasks for me.
Sincerely
Charles01
[edit] The Number 4
[edit] LIBELOUS Content - Richard Walter site
Bturvey is adding LIBELOUS information to the biography page of Richard Walter
Mr. Turvey is upset because Mr. Walter had blocked his admission to the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. To try to get even, Mr. Turvey has created libelous websites and is attempting to vandalize his wikipedia page.
I strongly suggest that the page be LOCKED at the point before Bturvey's vandalism.
To accuse someone of "perjury" and "fraud" is libel.
Please contact me so that we can settle this dispute.
Thank you very much,
User: Buzzle45
[edit] List of Star Trek Blueprints
"Jackilsfrm if this gets into an edit war let me know.". What do you mean? ~a (user • talk • contribs) 04:54, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey Arichnad....I just wanted Jackillsfrm to be aware that if the situation developed into an edit war to let me know and I would help him handle the situation through the proper protocols, rather than driving everyone nuts. Which I've seen happen all to often. Hope this answers your question. Shoessss 05:01, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
I have deleted the page I just do not feel that there is anything that I can do to make him happy, There are only so many hoops that I want to jump through. I will post this information somewhere else on the web, thanks for your time.
- Point of note: I did not nominate the article for deletion. Don't blame me. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 18:12, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
♦LOL...are we getting Paranoid???? No I never blame anyone.....the final decision is not in mine or your hands...that's what is nice a Wikipedia. It is a consensus. Have a great day....and thanks for the heads-up Shoessss 18:19, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- I was just clarifying. I don't want him to be mad at me :) ~a (user • talk • contribs) 18:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sentinel HC
Page created at 05:08 and you marked for deletion at 05:09. Fairly quick, a little hard to expand an article within a minute. C56C 05:14, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey C56C, no one has ever accused me of sitting on my hands when work is to be done. As you probably already know the deletion, tag is already lifted. In addition, which may help to prevent quick deletions (of hard-work), a note that the article is being expanded or doing a detailed outline in the sandbox prevents these quick-handed deletions. However, most importantly welcome to Wikipedia. Shoessss 11:23, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the welcome, but I started at wikipedia a few months before you. Last June. C56C 22:07, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] LaPret
{help me|This Person is notable, why is someone putting deletion tags on this page? Please remove and edit anything that you feel would cause this to happen, thanks! FranklinRose 00:36, 27 March 2007 (UTC)}
- I'm not sure why {{helpme}} has been used on a page that is not your own user talk page and I hope Shoessss doesn't mind me responding here. Once the Articles for deletion tag has been added it cannot be removed until the deletion debate has concluded. You can contribute to the deletion debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LaPret. The article needs to use reliable sources for its information.--Commander Keane 02:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- ♦No problem at all.....In fact appreciate the help....Have a great day.Shoessss 09:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
