Talk:Shi'a view of Muawiyah I
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Revert
Aladin, i reverted you. Are you claimíng the answering ansar article i lying? --Striver 15:15, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- Lying is a kind word. They do more than lie. The depth of their convoluted partisan rhetoric is why they will never attain reliable source status. The most you can do with this site is show where they link to, not formulate or editorialize, actual scholarly Shia sources.--AladdinSE 00:30, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Awkward sentence
Please review
- Shi'a quote some hadith where Muhammad is supposed to have cursed him and prophesied being resurrected with another then Muhammads on the resurrection day
I doesn't make much sense, grammatically. I don't understand the point that is being attempted. --AladdinSE 00:32, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] POV
The first few words in the introduction, The Shi'a have lost no opportunity to vilify ..., indicate a non-neutral point of view, but I do not know anything about the subject matter, and I am not sure to what extent the rest of the article is affected.--Niels Ø 14:53, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Is there any more POV in the article, or can we remove it now? --Striver 10:33, 17 May 2006 (UTC)