User talk:Shame On You

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Welcome!

Hello, Shame On You, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Cyde Weys 15:51, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] New userboxes

I have deleted a userbox template you recently created, as userboxes should no longer be created in templatespace per the terms of the German userbox solution. Here is the userbox code so that you can recreate the userbox in your userspace ("userfying") if you wish.

<div style="float:{{{float|left}}}; border:{{{border-width|1}}}px solid {{{border-color|#F48B66}}}; margin:1px;">
{| cellspacing="0" style="width:238px; background:{{{info-background|#351D21}}};"
| style="width:45px; height:45px; background:{{{logo-background|{{{1|#F48B66}}}}}}; text-align:center; font-size:{{{logo-size|12}}}pt; color:{{{logo-color|#F48B66}}};" | '''{{{logo|[[Image:Enthusiasm.png|May the enthusiasm be with you young padawan!|40px]]}}}'''
| style="font-size:{{{info-size|8}}}pt; padding:4pt; line-height:1.25em; color:{{{info-color|#A08362}}};" | '''This user is Enthusiast !''' 
|}</div>

--Cyde Weys 15:51, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RE:Sonatine

Actually I think I was right, if You go and read what the fields "Preceded by" and "Followed by" are for, You will remove the addition. Thank You kindly, feydey 21:12, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I'm afraid it is only for trilogies and such. feydey 21:20, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
I think the "Preceded by" and "Followed by" fields are very well defined. The problem is that You want to define it by the Director, why not by leading Actor/Actress or by Producer etc. - this is why it is like that. Do You see the point. And please do not go changing it by yourself. Best, feydey 21:28, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for volunteering to remove the links, I did the first film by Kitano, so You can do the rest. :) feydey 21:44, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vanity

Is this page vanity or not: Mikhail Lebedev --GoOdCoNtEnT 08:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

I've no time to waste with your stuffs, ask someone else, there are plenty of useless editors making peanuts outhere and I'm really busy. Shame On You 08:13, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mylène Farmer

You're right, it's not Mamoru Oshii who commited the video of Peut-être toi. Sorry and thank you ! ;) Cocoman3012 10:15, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

it looks like him, but it's not him. ^^ Shame On You 13:47, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Two examples

Below are two examples of controversial subjects that have been relatively free of POV pushing, I think because they're presented in a way that keeps people from feeling that a particular POV is present:

Attack on Pearl Harbor- I wrote the original version of the first section in the Background section about how Japan reached the decision to go to war with the U.S. Who's to blame for starting WWII in the Pacific is, of course, a very controversial topic and that article attracts a lot of POV pushers. Although other editors have modified my text to some degree, it still reads pretty much the same as I originally wrote it.

Japanese war crimes- An edit war was occurring in the "Official Apologies" section [1] (see the discussion page for details on the edit war). After I rewrote most of that section with numerous citations, it has been left completely alone since then. That article is also very controversial and attracts "tons" of POV-pushers, but that section has been left completely alone. I guess no one has a problem with it so far.

My point: Don't give up. You know that you've presented a controversial subject neutrally and well when it gets left alone, and then you've accomplished something in adding value to the overall Wikipedia body of knowledge. I'm sure that you have a lot that you can contribute to Wikipedia, in addition to what you've contributed so far. Cla68 02:33, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

it's really kind of you. i need time as i'm currently busy, but maybe i'll be able to find enough time though. Shame On You 01:55, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Question

Hey, you said your dad fought in World War II under the Free French Navy. I was just curious: what battles did he participate in?UberCryxic 00:42, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

wasn't my dad, by my grand father. my dad was Alpine Hunter in the french alps (he made igloos, sounds weird). My grand father lived in the French Algeria colony (it was actually called a "département"). I'll ask my father and uncle about that. Already heard the ship's name, remember it was famous (found pictures on google years ago), but i can't remember its name now. i'll just ask and told you. my father and grand father lived in Arzew (aka Arzeu, aka Arziw aka St.Leu). US troops came in Arzew in 1942 but my grand father was in the navy for years (my father was born four years later, actually he was "made" when my grand father returned from war in august/september 1945). they seemed to have fought there: here is an US Ranger in the outskirts of Arzew (father's house was behind the woods near the church). I don't know who they were figting, German or Vichy France. There must be infos about these events in US army or veterans sites. There's the Battle of Arzew wiki red link, its probably related with the 1942 US ops. Shame On You 01:12, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Yeah you said the Arromanches; that was a famous ship. This is cool man. Unfortunately, I don't have the DVDs, but I can sort of surmise what battles your grandpa might have been in.UberCryxic 16:34, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

like i said i'm not sure if it was this one. i just have to ask my father the ship's name and i'll be able to track the ship's op on internet. about the dvd, i've watched some yesterday, but it wasn't the good one. i'll check other volumes (collection is named "Images of War") and will encode the good one with US-english audio so you can see and understand by yourself. about US troops in French Algeria, seems the city (a strategic harbour) was taken by the German hence the US landing. Found infos here. Shame On You 16:39, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm into French military history, more specifically. Got into it after studying Napoleon's campaigns.UberCryxic 17:26, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

alright, i see. by the way found the video documentary i was talking about. it is a really well made document highly educative and really moving (each time i see the epilogue i am touched). it covers the Nazi and Allied operations from Austria to France. it was done by the US strategists it explains everything with maps (the Nazi tactics used in France is the best illustration i have seen so far). Well i'm now trying to turn it into Divx so you can enjoy it. it's called "Why We Fight #3: Divide & Conquer". From my point of view , i see many similarities between the French social situation in 1939 and 2006. Great book about this is Pierre Bruckner's La Tyrannie de La Pénitence (Penitence's tyranny), really educative. Well i'll try to make the Divx using the US-English audio so you can show this to the uneducated brainless post-2001 US claiming the French surrended without fighting. Shame On You 18:52, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] DIVIDE & CONQUER video documentary!!

great! the Divx (Xvid) is now in progress but i've just found the same video available in all formats and for free HERE (Pt.1/4)! it is licensed under free commons so we can use screnshots from it to add illustrations in Wikipedia. I've red user comments everyone found it great (except an idiot who only liked the animation and claimed the doc is too serious...). Watch, enjoy and learn! FILES DETAILS Pt.4/4 Shame On You 19:41, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Preview, Group, Summarize

Thank you for your edits. We are busy too, so I ask you to please consider 1) Using the Show Preview button (above the Save Page button), 2) Grouping edits together to reduce the number of edits in the page History to make it easier for fellow editors to monitor the edits, 3) Describing each edit with the Edit Summary box (above the Save Page button). Hu 18:40, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

improvisation cannot be grouped and enhancements or precisions cannot be foreseen. Shame On You 18:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
because of your stupid policy i just lost an hour edit due to an idiot who did a minor edit and provoked an edit conflict! fucking shit i'll do as i've ever do and i don't care now if you don't like it. this place is full of asshole doing peanuts and giving unsollicited stupid advices to serious editors. next time just shut up. Shame On You 22:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
You might want to consider using Template:inuse to let others know that you're in the middle of something. If you don't, you can hardly call someone an idiot who hardly knows that you're in the middle of something. I know you're tired and frustrated, but please refrain from personal attacks. You're not the only serious editor around here. Akradecki 04:10, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
yep. Shame On You 06:59, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Neuron

Sorry, not what I meant. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 22:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

ok dude, now i think i'll take a nap. Shame On You 22:40, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] NPA

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. yandman 14:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

ok, i'll try to not behave in wikipedia just like in real life. Shame On You 16:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] nEUROn translation

In general "aviation english", this would be translated as "twin-engine" and "single-engine" (for instance, I work on a twin-engine Bell 412 helicopter, and the one parked next door is a single-engine Bell OH-58). When the term is used repeatedly, it's also acceptable to abbreviate it slightly to "twin" and "single", example: a Cessna 441 is a twin, a Cessna 150 is a single. Hope that helps. My teenage daughter is learning French at school, and since I help her with her homework a lot, I'm pretty much learning it, too...although we're still at the "beginner" stage. Oh, by the way, I added the standard UAV project info box to the LOGIDUC page, but wasn't sure which of the aircraft to put specs up for. What do you suggest? Akradecki 16:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your infos. Hehe bienvenue, You'll notice French is not so far from English language as actually more than 40% (or 60%?) of English are from French origins including "aviation". There's this useful synonyms free online, English-French/French-English dictionary you can use to learn new terms. I saw your entry to the LOGIDUC, I like the frame around the picture it makes it looks great! Since the AVE-D and C were scale models (the usual industrial process), I suggest to use the final vehicle AVE Grand Duc. Shame On You 17:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
BTW if you haven't seen it yet here's the Petit Duc flying :) and this is a video of the Dassault Super Etendard (carrier Charles de Gaulle) in a bombing mission in support to the US in Afghanistan.

[edit] European defense question

A few days ago, you removed the F-35 reference from the nEUROn article with the edit summary stating "removed US aircraft (has nothing to do with european defense". I don't really care if that info is in the article or not, but I'm really curious why you said that in the edit summary, as several European nations are purchasing the F-35 for European defense, the Dutch being the latest to be in the news (getting 85 ships, no less). Akradecki 19:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

"European aerospace companies' design offices" as far i as know the F-35 is an US aircraft and so is not manufactured by an "european company" is it? Shame On You 02:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Do not Vandalize User pages.

Do not vandalize user pages by putting images of grasshoppers on them: [2], [3], [4], or in any other way. Hu 07:51, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

they are not users but vandals stupid asshole! and if you had reported them as such instead of posting here they would had been blocked and prevented to vandalize articles since a long time! Shame On You 10:29, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

NPA2: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. You have already been warned above about No Personal Attacks. You need to avoid taking things so personally. You are leaving a trail all over Wikipedia Talk pages. Hu 12:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

"so tell me why the hell did you used fansub amateurish material as source instead of licensed products?" you also using your user name and IP in the same talk see Talk:Buttetsu_Bateau#Bateau"Anyone who can give more official uses of Batou than there are of bateau feel free to revert it and flame me. ;)81.151.124.131 00:54, 14 November 2006 (UTC)" Please keep cool ( il est peut être temps de se calmer ;-) --Neuromancien 19:44, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
WTF? first learn English, second go fuck elsewhere asshole. your post is here is pointless and totally irrelevant. you come here with nonsense and shit, what's this IP? i'm millionaire in IP so what? you come here flame me in French so the English admins can't get it. je t'encule sale PD! tu crois quoi que j'ai qu'une seule IP sale con? j'ai plein de comptes ici et dans les autres wiki alors va te faire mettre sale facho de merde. bloquez-en une j'en créé cinq autres pauvre cave. je vais où je veux, je dis ce que je veux quand je veux et je t'encule pauvre type! ton IP c'est 81.49.252.171 au fait, alors il est temps que tu fermes ta sale gueule de pd. :) Shame On You 16:17, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
I don't flame you even in french and i'm not 81.xxx.xxx.xxx ( i was just saying it was time to stay cool but i see now it is too late for you ).What you say in french is approximately "I fuck you up Gay**** ! you believe that I have that only one IP dirty idiot? I have a lot of accounts here and in the others wiki then fuck off ****. block one I will create five other poor ****. I go where I want, I say what I want when I want and I fuck you up the ass poor guy! your IP is 81.49.252.171 so it is time that you close your dirty mouth Gay***".You just hurt yourself.--Neuromancien 06:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
hurt? i'm alright and don't give a damn fool. Shame On You 20:32, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] On your block

I have blocked this account for three weeks for extreme and gross violations of our WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA policies, per discussion here. Please consider how to change your behavior and contribute to our community and encyclopedia positively once this block has expired. RyanGerbil10(Упражнение В!) 17:10, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

whatever, time has come for me to stop wasting my time trying to educate ungrateful foreign kids. Shame On You 20:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Rafale-petit-duc-escort-2004.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rafale-petit-duc-escort-2004.png. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 14:55, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

i'm coming bavk from vacation, can't figure out what^picture was this one. anyway it's too late now since the pic was deleted before i came. Shame On You 20:25, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Redspecdvdusa.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Redspecdvdusa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:45, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Kitano4th.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kitano4th.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:04, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Akaimeganevideoprmeium.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Akaimeganevideoprmeium.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 14:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] What is a UCLA? (UCAV?) re Dassault nEUROn

On 19:49, 14 November 2006, you added the text:

  However Dassault plan to primary use the data collected by the demonstrator to produce UCLAs.

to the Dassault nEUROn article. What are the UCLAs mentioned? UCLA is the university of california los angeles jim morrison was in: it was actually "UCAV" Shame On You 07:47, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Also, the grammar of that sentence needs to be cleaned up. Did you mean to say plans instead of plan? Did you mean primarily instead of primary? 75.185.66.16 15:11, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

yes it is primarily. Shame On You 07:47, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../s/h/a/User_talk%7EShame_On_You_b251.html"