User talk:Shadowbot
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Laois GAA
I was accused of spamming when in fact all I was doing was adding in a valid and official Laois GAA website, I don't see how it can be referred to as spamming. I would like some sort of answer on this topic. I am going to put the link back into the external links page, I hope this isn't construed as further spamming and I would like it left there and my record wiped clean. sincerely Ram
[edit] Miharu Hirano link
- My edit to the article of a Tekken character, Miharu Hirano, was reverted and called spam. It wasn't spam. I was merely trying to provide a link to a Miharu Hirano picture because there wasn't a picture of her in the article at the moment. It was the only picture that I could find. I would never spam Wikipedia. / KristiRenee. / November 23, 2006.
[edit] Kellie Pickler's Article
Ok. Just understand: This URL is the only where i can confirm that "I Wonder" is kellie pickler's new single. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by KelliePicklerFanatic (talk • contribs).
[edit] Holy Trinity Church v. United States
I don't see why the link added to Holy Trinity Church v. United States is deemed spam (other than triggered by the generic address filter). The cited court case is often used in apologetic arguments. Hence the link added is useful to debunk that argument, plus it provides additional information, including information on later cases that used that ruling/opinion.
[edit] Speedy Delete
I put a speedy delete test page link onto a page, and I was reverted. Here is your reverted edition. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wood_causes_sparks&oldid=114937353 Sorry, my fault, I accidentally clicked the URL link in the editing bar, and didnt notice, it thought i was putting a link in.
[edit] Your bot wiped out an entire infobox
--172.167.245.115 00:14, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- My apologies. The bot was doing its job by removing an imageshack link. Shadow1 (talk) 11:56, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Chandra Wilson interview.
Hi, I asked a couple of questions last week. I was wondering if you had any answers for me. Below is the original text. Thanks!
[edit] Reversions of data removed due to WP:BLP
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bryan_Danielson&action=history
see contributions here... content removed per WP:BLP is being readded by the bot. ALKIVAR™ ☢ 07:50, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- The problem should be fixed. I had included obsessedwithwrestling on the bot's blacklist due to a spam attack last week, and didn't think it would be appropriate to remove the rule just yet, which is what tripped the bot. Shadow1 (talk) 18:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your edit to Dean Lister
Your recent edit to Dean Lister (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 21:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Shawn Michaels
Hi,
I made some edits to this page, and was providing very good, external links for this article, to enhance it so it is at the very best standard. Here is the link. I firmly believe it is a good link. Can you please not revert my edits again.
Many thanks Davnel03 08:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Are you listening to me??? Davnel03 09:00, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Yes. I've added you to Shadowbot's user whitelist, it shouldn't bother you again. Shadow1 (talk) 15:27, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Urbandictionary & Oral sex
You reverted this change to oral sex due to the link to www.urbandictionary.com. This does not appear to be spam. I'm not going to revert your link, because I don't know if you'll revert back, but I suggest removing the site from your blacklist and reinserting the change. (I'm not sure it's a particularly good edit, but that should be dealt with in the normal course of business.) Matchups 19:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
