Talk:Sharad Pawar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject_India This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
This article is maintained by the Indian politics workgroup.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

Contents

[edit] sharad pawar

was mr. sharad pawar part of shiv sena at any given time?

No he was not a member of Shiv Sena anytime.On personal level he maintains very coordial and friendly relations with Bal Thackeray but politically he is very much opposed to Sena.

146.201.27.12 15:54, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tone down

Article reads like a promotion material. Needs to be properly authored to conform to Wikipedia standards. =Nichalp «Talk»= 05:11, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] What can one else add more.....?

Dear friend , Hi 1. Your concern is indeed thoughtful.

2.But , let me tell you , we cannot deny a person his credit ,if he has done good deeds.In this case , Sharad Pawar .Sometimes , highlighting some one's positive achievements unfortunately attracts wrong charges of PROMOTIONALISM .So , kindly do not have doubts about sharad pawar and therefore remove the tag added by you .

3.We can write about controversies surrounding sharad pawar like THE US $ 50 MILLION FAKE STAMP-PAPER - TELGI SCAM TO MAKE IT TOTALLY NEUTRAL , BUT , WILL THEN WIKIPEDIA BE BOLD ENOUGH TO WRITE THE SAME ON THIS PAGE...?

With regards , Coolcoolcoolest 15:13, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: What can one else add more.....?

Hi There,

Wikipedia is a very unbiased website and since it is a website it cannot be easily vandalised and hence Wikipedia is much more honest than any other media and Wikipedia would ABSOLUTELY have no problem in mentioning the Telgi Scam, which it does.

Regards

[edit] neutrality

this page is neutral.

[edit] More details

Can some one add more info about his life from 1940 to 1967?