Talk:Selvaraghavan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indian cinema, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Indian cinema. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
|
More information about this article...
|
|
[edit] Plot??
I don't see the need for the plot of '7G Rainbow Colony' in this article about Selvaraghavan. --Madhu 13:11, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
- removed now, don't wait for others :-) --M.arunprasad 06:59, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
This article uses lots of subjective judgement, including statements like: "Selvaraghavan is one of the India's emerging prolific film director whose roots are from the southern part of India",: The intention is not to dispute that he is an accomplished director. The fact is that the statements above are entirely subjective. They should be reworded as something like : "selvaraghavan is an emerging film director in the Tamil movie industry, widely appreciated for his ...."
"His directorial skills were appreciated by most of the India's leading directors and people concerning cinema.": Well, you can't say that 'coz you haven't really talked to each of India's leading directors, have you? It should be reworded as "His directorial skills have drawn apprecation from several promininent directors including X, Y, z". And you must provide citations here.
"The best compliments he has received are from the Press and from Bharathiraja who said of Kaadhal Kondein that "After Nayagan, it's the best film I've seen":- Again, we can't judge that. Simply state that "Veteran movie dir Bharathiraja is said to have remarked on "kK" that "After Nygn...."
"He has worked on his characters so well that you forget that they are stars and you can identify with them easily": really? thats what all good movies do. This statement has no merit. Instead you can state that:
His movies are characterised by their strong dialogues, casting and real-life screenplay.." blah blah blah..
