User talk:Securiger
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
/Archive November 2003 - November 2004
/Archive December 2004 - May 2006
Contents |
[edit] TRIFID
I'm working my way through the Classical cryptography articles and find some anomalies such as
We don't have an article called "Trifid cipher" Search Wikipedia for Trifid cipher - it might be called something else. ...but you can write it!
But I've seen it and read it.--Steve 08:45, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Ball-peen_hammer_380mm.JPG
If you have a chance, could you upload this to Commons so I can get to it from Wiktionary? Thanks. Steve Summit (talk) 20:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AP Mines
Nice work... soon we'll have this page and Land mine (from which I spawned AP mines) in a much better shape! Deon Steyn 06:03, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Heliograph
Thanks for the reply. It was while I was researching and creating the various sunshine recorder articles that I found out about the Heliograph, as a sunshine recorder, and wondered how it worked. I "assume" that the mirror burns a piece of paper but I couldn't find out for sure as all Heliograph sites talk only about signals. They took our Campbell-Stokes recorder away about two weeks after I took the picture. They now use solar radiation to tell the amount of sun. Kind of miss the thing, as we don't get to see how much we had, but it sure is nice not having to clean the frost off at -40C. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 06:22, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Star polygon(8-3).png listed for deletion
[edit] Ditch article
Hi Securiger- Ran across the ditch article while messing around in the moat. Is there some reference material that supports the distinction you make between trenches and ditches, at least for military engineering? The main dictionary I use for general definitions doesn't agree with that distinction. Thanks. -Eric (talk) 21:33, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Nuclear_reaction_Li6-d.png
Hi Securiger. This is a nice picture, but please remove the energies of the two outgoing particles. These energies would only be correct if the ingoing particles had no energy at all, but then the reaction would not run. HPaul 17:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)