User talk:Sebweb19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Sebweb19, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Regards, Accurizer 23:27, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Essec-france-mba.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Essec-france-mba.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:06, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ESSEC bias

Hi there! You've made great contributions to the ESSEC's page but many of them are severely biased. Most appalingly, many edits are written subjectively ("Check out our programme!", "we can offer you X", etc) which is definitely a Wikipedia policy violation. You should take the time to discover the free encyclopedia and its spirit before making partisan changes, because we (as a community) do not want this knowledge base to corrupted by corporate interests. Please don't continue editing until you've mastered the subtle art of unbiasing your point of view. Look at my edits for instance (not that I'm a model or anything): I've added many good things relating to the ESSEC, because I study there and was shocked to see that Wikipedia had so little information about the school, but that doesn't mean I boasted about unproved generalities, and even that it didn't occur to me to modify (positively) pages of rival B-schools. Also, my edits concerning the ESSEC are just a minority of my total edits, maybe a couple percent only.
Nevertheless, I feel on a personal level that your contribution was meaningful, and that many factual errors can be avoided if you continue monitoring the pages relating to the ESSEC. But, please no more advertising! Rdavout 08:55, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ESSEC suite...

Salut Sébastien ! Désolé pour mon ton dans mon commentaire : je croyais que tu faisais partie de l'administration de l'ESSEC ;-) C'est aussi pour ça que j'avais enlevé la pub avec Geoffroy Roux de Bézieux. Je trouvais que ça faisait trop, et comme je ne la trouve pas très belle... Ceci dit, si tu y tiens et tu crois qu'elle est valorisante pour l'école, à toi de voir en fait si tu veux la remettre. ++ Rdavout 19:39, 15 June 2006 (UTC)