Talk:Seaside, Florida
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Seriously needs NPOV
This article reads like a commercial for their philosophy of town design, or actually come to think of it, like a recruiting pamphlet for a cult. I'm marking it. Jaysbro 21:11, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Instances of bias
- "Encumbered" - implying that traditional urban planning is an unfair burden
- "Traditional" in quotation marks, to imply disdain
- "unique" and "fine-grained": undefined but positive-sounding words
- Unsupported assertion that other town planners don't hire architects
- Irrelevant material about DPZ's philosophical integrity
- "success": what measure of success is being used, and who is doing the measuring? Just the increase in property values? 10% annual increase is not all that unusual.
- "surprisingly affordable": what measure of affordable? Who's doing the measuring? Again the use of unnecessarily positive (but unnecessarily vague) words
- "learned": this word implies that the philosophy being studied is true
- "many thousands": unnecessarily vague, unncessarily positive connotation
- "Seaside institute": Off-topic for the article; all that needs to be said is "The seaside institute is based in, and based on the philosophy of"
- "Celebration": off-topic for the article about Seaside!
- "housing projects": off-topic
And is DPZ a corporation, or two people referred to as a single unit?
-
- I disagree that the mention of celebration is off-topic. Celebration is another city designed with similar goals and theory. I think a mention of celebration is fair. I feel the article is vague and could use more hard facts, but it is far from cult literature.
[edit] Map request
[edit] Kentlands Citizens Assembly website
Why is there a link to it on this page?