Scythian monks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scythian Monks were a community of monks from the region around the mouth of the Danube, who played an influential role in Christian life between the fourth and the sixth century, shaping modern Christian dogma and the Christian calendar through their works. The name Scythian does not refer to ethnicity, but comes from Scythia Minor, the classical name of the modern Dobrogea region in Romania, a former Roman province. The monks were raised not only from the Romanised Christian Thraco-Roman elements, but also from immigrant Christians who came to live ascetic lives.

Contents 1 History 2 Influence 2.1 The Theopaschite doctrine 2.2 Other legacies 2.3 The Anno Domini 3 The community 4 See also 5 References

[edit] History

Based on article History of Christianity in Romania.

Scythia Minor was part of the Roman Empire since the 1st century, incorporating the local Christian elements into the religious life of the Roman/East Roman Empire. The first contact with Christianity in the area was when Saint Andrew, brother of Saint Peter, passed through it in the 1st century with his disciples. Later on, Christianity became the predominant faith of the region, as proven by the large number of remains of early Christian churches. The Roman administration was ruthless with the Christians, as the great number of martyrs demonstrates.

Bishop Ephrem, killed on 7 March 304 in Tomis, was the first Christian martyr of this region and was followed by countless others, especially during the repression ordered by emperors Diocletian, Galerius, Licinius and Julian the Apostate. A large number of dioceses and martyrs are first attested during the times of Ante-Nicene Fathers. The first known Daco-Roman Christian priest Montanus and his wife Maxima were drowned as martyrs because of their faith on 26 March 304.

The 1971 archaeological digs under the paleo-Christian basilica in Niculitel (near ancient Noviodunum in Scythia Minor) unearthed an even older martyrium. Besides Zoticos, Attalos, Kamasis and Filippos, who suffered martyrdom under Diocletian (304-305), the relics of two previous martyrs, who witnessed and died during the repression of Emperor Decius (249-251), were unearthed under the crypt. Since their deaths, the names of these martyrs have been placed in church records, and the discovery of the tomb with the names written inside was astonishing.

Once the Dacian-born Emperor Galerius proclaimed freedom for Christians all over the Roman Empire in 311, the city of Tomis alone (modern Constanţa) became Metropolitanate with as many as 14 bishoprics. By the 4th century, a powerful and organised nucleus of Christian monks existed in the area.

The fact that the relics of the famous Saint Sava (martyred by drowning in the River Buzău, under Athanaric on 12 April 372) were recovered by Saint Basil the Great conclusively demonstrates that (unlike bishop Wulfila) Saint Sava was a follower of the Nicene faith, not a heresiarch like Arius.

[edit] Influence

[edit] The Theopaschite doctrine

The Scythian monks made an important contribution to christology, by advocating what has come to be known as the Theopaschite formula as a solution to controversies about the nature of Christ arising after the Council of Chalcedon. First formulated in 513, it was initially rejected by both the Eastern and Western branches of the church. Over time it was gradually accepted and the formula was vindicated at the Second Council of Constantinople in 553.

The problems between the adepts of different Christologies arose with Pope Leo I`s "Tome" (Latin text, a letter), a treatise from year 449 against the Monophysite leader Eutyches, which had been supported the Council of Chalcedon in 451, where the heresiarch Eutyches was condemned. The Tome defined the two natures and one person of Christ. The one of these is brilliant with miracles, the other succumbs to injuries. This could be interpreted to mean that Christ has two independently acting subjects, the divine nature which does the miracles and the human nature which does the suffering. Pope Leo I proposed his Tome as a way of distinguishing Christ's natures, but he did not intend to suggest that the natures were really separate parts. The Council of Chalcedon had attempted to settle the Nestorian and the Monophysite controversies by approving Pope Leo's Tome, confessing that Christ has two natures in one person. However, by endorsing Leo's Tome, the council appeared to have endorsed the Nestorian heresy, that held Jesus to be two distinct persons: closely and inseparably united, but still, distinct. This is what the Monophysites accused Chalcedon of doing.

One chapter of this debate, the "Theopaschite Controversy" of the sixth century, arose in the town of Tomis, on the coast of the Black Sea. The strong community of monks living in the East Roman province of Scythia Minor became embroiled in this Christological argument with their Archbishop from Tomi. The "Scythian Monks" (as they were called by the Christian community due to their geographic origin) were fervent advocates of a christology which was both Chalcedonian (i.e. followed the Christological teachings of the Council of Chalcedon), and Cyrillian as well as an Augustinian doctrine of grace, which they hoped, would unite the Western and Eastern Churches. They drew their own connection between Christology and grace: they put forward a Christology which draws heavily on Cyril of Alexandria (the formula of the oneness of Christ’s nature as the incarnation of God the Word), emphasizing the unity of Christ, while advocating an Augustinian doctrine of grace, emphasizing the role of grace and eliminating independent human effort from the performance of good works and salvation. The Scythian monks saw themselves as defenders of the Council of Chalcedon, asserting that the Tome should not be interpreted as it had been done by then. In support of their contention, the Scythian monks cited passages from Pope Leo's epistles which more clearly express the unity of Christ. However, because the Tome could be interpreted to divide Christ, the Scythian monks felt it necessary to find a way to exclude such a Nestorianizing misinterpretation. They did this in 513, by advocating what has come to be known as the Theopaschite formula: "llnus ex Trinitate passus est" (meaning "One of the Trinity suffered in the flesh"), wanting to exclude both Nestorianistic and Monophysitistic tendencies, and at the same time seeking to have the works of Faustus of Riez condemned as being tainted with Pelagianism. Their views caused controversy to erupt in Constantinople. The monks felt that if one confesses their statement along with the deliberation of the Council of Chalcedon, then the Orthodox interpretation of the council is preserved, as the Theopaschite formula makes it clear that Logos (the unifying principle linking God and man) is the acting subject not only for the miracles of Christ, but also for his suffering.

The monks initially won the support of Vitalian, an East Roman general set as the magister per militias of Thrace, and leader of a powerful religious rebellion against Emperor Anastasius II, who was a convinced Monophysite. Vitalian was native of the Scythia Minor and one of the members of the group of monks was a relative of his. The rebellion started in 512, when a nearly identical formula to that of the scythian monks, added to the Trisagion in the liturgy of Hagia Sophia, was removed by Emperor Anastasius II. The rebellion continued until 520, when Vitalian was assassinated by the new Emperor, Justin I, who wanted to spare the empire from any future rebellions. By that time, orthodoxy extended even to the army: soldiers were ordered to subscribe to the creed of Chalcedon or be deprived of their rations. At the beginning of the year 519 a delegation of the Scythian monks traveled to Constantinople under the leadership of John Maxentius to bring their case before the Emperor Justin I, proposing a new solution by arguing in favor of their formula. They were fiercely opposed by the legates from Rome and by the "Sleepless Monks" (irronically, in trying to combat the Eutychian tendencies of the Scythian monks, the "Sleepless monks" themselves shifted into Nestorianism, and had to be excommunicated by Pope John II). Faced with this opposition, the Scythian monks view was that although the Chalcedonian definition (strongly supported by Rome) was indeed an orthodox expression of the faith, it was susceptible to a Nestorianizing misinterpretation which would in effect split Christ into two persons despite the verbal acknowledgment that Christ has only one person. Also, the Scythian monks proposal was not well received, mainly because the timing: the monks arrived in Constantinople just as the emperor Justin I was negotiating an end to the Acacian schism. This split between Rome and Constantinople originated in 484 when Pope Felix III excommunicated Acacius, the Patriarch of Constantinople, for attempting to evade the council of Chalcedon in his attempt to bring the Monophysites back under control. Acacius had advised the emperor Zeno to issue a statement, the Henotikon (the "act of union"; 482), which was an attmept to reconcile the differences between the supporters of Orthodoxy and of Monophysitism. But the Henotikon failed to insist upon Chalcedon as the standard of orthodoxy, and the Council of Chalcedon, because of its endorsement by the Tome of Pope Leo, had become a mark of the prestige of the Roman See. Acacius's apparent attempt to ignore Chalcedon was seen as an insult against Rome's claim to be the gold standard of orthodoxy. At the time the monks arrived in Constantinople, the political landscape changed and the emperor Justin I policies were directed more to the west than to the east where the Monophysits were preponderent. This policy led him, in 519, to accede to Rome's demand that Chalcedon be the official Christological confession of the empire. He received the emissaries from Rome in triumphal procession, and Patriarch John of Constantinople signed documents ending the thirty-five years old schism. Thus, when the Scythian monks arrive on the scene urging that the resolutions of Chalcedon needed to be supplemented with their Theopaschite formula, no side was willing to listen. The Scythian monks views were interpreted as an attack on the Council of Chalcedon and thus as a threat to the newly established reunion between Rome and Constantinople. A bishop from North Africa named Possessor, who was in Constantinople at the same time as the Scythian monks, also opposed their Christological position by citing Faustus of Riez, who the Scythian monks accused of the Pelagianistic herezy.

Failing to gain acceptance in Constantinople, some of the monks, led by John Maxentius, procedeed to Rome in 519, in hopes of winning Pope Hormisdas' support. Despite an initial warm reception and supportive letters from Justinian who had by then started to change his mind about the monks formula, they were unable to win over the pope, as he was reticent to offer his support to a group of monks who had openly opposed his legates in Constantinople. By 520, the pope failed giving his judgment on their position. The monks were indignated because of this lack of response. Despite their loud protests, they did not receive a new audience with the pope. Finally, after fourtheen months, the monks left Rome. Shortly after 13 August 520, their behavior in Rome prompted Pope Hormisdas to write a letter to the same Possessor in Constantinople, criticizing their theology and severely condemning their vociferous objections. When presented by their defractors with this letter from the Pope, Maxentius responded that the pope could not possibly have written it because whoever wrote it was clearly a heretic. Some historians have suggested that after this episode, Maxentius had retreated to Tintagel in Britannia, to the regilious community living there, and that his name is mentioned on the Latin inscription the Arthur stone^[1]. In the end, the Scythian monks found support first from one quarter: they wrote a letter to the bishops of North Africa who at that time were exiled by the Vandals to the island of Sardinia. The leader of the north-African bishops, Fulgentius of Ruspe composed the reply by which they accepted the christological formula as well as the monks Augustinian doctrine of grace. Meanwhile, at Constantinople, Emperor Justin I had died, and his nephew Justinian, a theologian in his own right, becoming the new emperor in 527, also began to support the monks position, being convinced that the monks statement was orthodox and perceiving that it could make Chalcedon more acceptable to Monophysites in the East. In 531 the monks took part in public disputes arranged by Emperor Justinian (527-565) between Catholics and the Monophysite followers of Severus of Antioch. Eventually, the emperors support of the "Theopaschite formula" finally paved the way for its vindication at the Second Council of Constantinople in 553, of which canon 10 reads: "If anyone does not confess that our Lord Jesus Christ who was crucified in flesh is true God and Lord of glory and one of the holy Trinity, let him be anathema".

The Scythian monks made an important contribution to christology in the wake of the Chalcedon controversies by proposing their formula. The initial detractive movements disspeared as the views of the Scythian monks were strongered by the wide acceptance of this formula, as it served to refute the tendency of Nestor to subjectively interpret the decisions of the Council of Chalcedon, as ascribing Christ's miracles to his divine nature while ascribing his suffering only to his human nature.

[edit] Other legacies

The Roman philosopher and mathematician Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius wrote the three opuscula sacra to analyse points of Christian doctrine. The fifth treatise, against Eutyches and Nestorius, and the two treatises on the Trinity are primarily based on the intervention of the Scythian monks. Boethius's writing has an interest far beyond their contributions to the doctrinal debate, being one of the most influetial theological books in European culture.

Apart from their merit against Nestorians and Monophysites, the imbold given to Aristotelianism by some of the members of the Scythian monks community, marks an epoch in the history of Christian philosophy. Leontius has often been been described as the first of the Scholastics.

John Cassian a member of the Scythian monks, retreated to the North African desert to the community called the "Desert Fathers", where he continued to be an important figure in the Church and society of the fourth and fifth century. Cassian, togheter with Augustine of Hippo, Athanasius of Alexandria and John Chrysostom, emphasized the idea of an ascent to God through periods of purgation and illumination that led to unity with the Divine. This ideology of the so called "Desert fathers" deeply affected the spirituality of the Western Church. For this reason, the writings and spirituality of the desert fathers are still of interest to many people today.

[edit] The Anno Domini

see main article: Anno Domini.

At Rome, Pope Gelasius had appointed Dionysius Exiguus, a member of the "Scythian Monks" community whom he knew from Constantinople, to translate documents in the papal archive. Later, Dionysius worked under the new Pope John I, translating from Greek into Latin the Easter tables drawn up by Saint Theophilus, of the Church of Alexandria, and his successor Saint Cyril. He saw the opportunity to dispense with the old numbering system, the Anno Diocletiani, in which years were counted from the beginning of the reign of the pagan Roman Emperor Diocletian. After laborious calcules, he replaced the anno Diocletiani era with his anno Domini era because he did not wish to continue the memory of a tyrant who persecuted Christians. Thus, he introduced the method of reckoning the Christian era from the birth of Christ. Cassiodorus praises in his Institutiones, the talents and the work of Dionysius Exiguus, and this indicates that he was personally acquainted with the rest of the "Scythian monks".

[edit] The community

Notable members:

• John Maxentius
• Dionysius Exiguus
• John Cassian
• Leontius Byzantinus

[edit] See also

• Romanian Orthodox Church
• Councils and Synods
• ecumenical council
• Chalcedonian Creed
• Byzantium after Byzantium

[edit] References

• Patrick T. R. Gray: "The Defense of Chalcedon in the East". Studies in the History of Christian Thought, ed. Heiko A. Oberman, v. 20 (Leiden, 1979);
• Aloys Grillmeier: "Christ in Christian Tradition"; "From the Council of Chalcedon to Gregory the Great"; Trans. John Cawte and Pauline Allen (Louisville, 1995);
• John Maxentius: "Libellus Fidei"; Ed. François Glorie. Corpus Christianorum Series Latina 85A (Turnholt, 1978);
• Edward Schwartz: "Acta Conciliorum Oecumenicorum"; Tome 4, vol. 2, Concilium Univerale Constantinopolitanum Sub lustiniano Habitum. Trübner, 1934, i–xxxii.
• Otto Bardenhewer: "Patrology"; St. Louis, 1908;
• Karl Krumbacher: "Geschichte der byzantinischen Litteratur"; (Munich, 1897);
• Jacques Zeiller: "Les origines chrétiennes dans les provinces danubiennes de l'Empire Romain"; (Paris:1918);