User talk:Scullin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello Scullin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Lectonar 07:13, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Satellite.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Satellite.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, so its copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged imaged will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much.

It als is a bad name Stuyvesant_Town_Satellite.jpg would have been better. Zeimusu | Talk page 08:16, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Request for assistance on a consulting project

Scullin--

I work for a company called Gerson Lehrman Group, one of the largest providers of independent research. We manage the GLG Councils (www.glgcouncils.com) and are starting our own Wiki and launching several collaborative research projects using Wiki technology. [We will NOT be making entries on Wikipedia.] If you are interested in particpating in a paid opportunity to work on a project related to your knowledge of the Aggregates industry, please email me at your earliest convenience at mmayes@glgroup.com - Thank you for your interest in GLG. We look forward to working with you. Best, Mike

[edit] NRAM

I don't dispute that the technology in question is highly theoretical, but it seems no more so than, say, the new Japanese/European supersonic airliner. I can't be sure, but I find it difficult to believe that if I compared the later to, say, a 747-400, that you would consider that to be an unfair comparison.

You later posit that the "post" that started it all was made by a Nantero employee. That may be, although I consider it to be idle speculation. But to suggest that I am also an employee is silly. Did you bother to look at my edit list before making this claim? Was there something in my ~10k edits that suggested this to you? I find it particularily amusing that you added a para on MRAM to "even it out"; amusing because I wrote the majority of the MRAM article as well (and FeRAM, core, acoustic, twistor, bubble, selectron, among others)

The article in its last form was simply a description of an interesting and potentially useful system. That's all. Yout injections of "balance", seemingly randomly deposited through the article, even in the middle of two sentances that are conceptually connected. This really effected readability IMHO. And why exactly did you capitalize Silicon?

So here's what I'm going to do. First I'm going to move the article to "Nano-RAM", and turn the NRAM page into a pointer to NVRAM. On THAT page I'll add a link back in the disambig section. I'm also going to collect up all of your comments into a single section, dividing the article into description, comparison and viability sections.

Maury 13:08, 31 October 2005 (UTC)