User talk:Scoreboard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Scoreboard, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! J Milburn 21:48, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Pacific Conference
Hi, just noticed this article. I have a concern as to the notability of the subject. Wikipedia has strict rules regarding notability, which you can read about here. This is to stop people writing about just anything. If you do not provide evidence that the subject of the article meets notability guidelines, it could be deleted. Contact me if I can be of any help. J Milburn 21:48, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- I took a look at the sources that you cited, but neither of them really seem to mention the 'Pacific Conference'. Now, I don't know much about the American schooling system- what exactly is this conference? J Milburn 22:09, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- Ah yes, I see. Now, my concern with the article is that it does not meet notability guidelines. The primary notability criteria is the basic rule for inclusion on Wikipedia. The basic gist of it is that the subject of the article has to have been written about, more than once, in a reliable, published source, which is independent of the subject itself. Also, it has to be a non-trivial mention. Some good places that the articles might well be would be various local papers. However, if the league doesn't meet the notability criteria, it would probably be better suited to being mentioned in the articles about the schools, with no article of its own. Please don't be put off if this is the case, someone interested in writing serious articles, or just making minor tweaks to existing ones, is always welcome at Wikipedia. Again, contact me if I can be of any help. J Milburn 22:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- Sports leagues are by no means my area of speciality. However, if you find some articles in the local papers that tell you about the league, and not just mention the scores, that should certainly cover the notability guidelines. You don't have to find a link to them, there is a template here that allows you to cite newspapers, I use it myself all the time. However, there may well be online versions of the articles. J Milburn 22:44, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- Ah yes, I see. Now, my concern with the article is that it does not meet notability guidelines. The primary notability criteria is the basic rule for inclusion on Wikipedia. The basic gist of it is that the subject of the article has to have been written about, more than once, in a reliable, published source, which is independent of the subject itself. Also, it has to be a non-trivial mention. Some good places that the articles might well be would be various local papers. However, if the league doesn't meet the notability criteria, it would probably be better suited to being mentioned in the articles about the schools, with no article of its own. Please don't be put off if this is the case, someone interested in writing serious articles, or just making minor tweaks to existing ones, is always welcome at Wikipedia. Again, contact me if I can be of any help. J Milburn 22:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Show preview and edit summaries
[edit] Show preview
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again.
[edit] Edit summaries
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.
Katr67 17:17, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Hazelbrook Middle School
An editor has nominated Hazelbrook Middle School, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hazelbrook Middle School and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 09:26, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
