Talk:Scouting in Aberdeen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scouting Wiki Project Scouting in Aberdeen is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject Scotland
Scouting in Aberdeen is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.


[edit] Merge of Templars' Park Scout Campsite here

I am inclined to leave this article for now. The issue of sourcing the history that I raised on Talk:Templars' Park Scout Campsite needs to be addressed as it may be a copyvio. If it is, then I support merge. If it is not, this is an interesting article on an important Scout Camp Site. --Bduke 22:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Oppose merge. --evrik (talk) 17:31, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Oppose merge - there's a lot of information in the campsite article which wouldn't really be well placed in the Area article... you are correct about sourcing the historical information, though... Horus Kol 16:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Oppose: It needs work, but it is more than a crufty stub like most camp articles start as. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 11:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment It's time for the merge tag to go. --evrik (talk) 04:46, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

I've removed them. Evrik is correct. There is no support for the merge in nearly a month. --Bduke 05:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)