Talk:Scott Sonnon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

This article was nominated for deletion on September 6, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

[edit] PoV allegation

It is obvious this article is biased and written by a fan or a group of people affiliated with the man discussed. Therefore the POV tag has been added.

It is more obvious that this ongoing slagging of the individual is being conducted by the group (www.russianmartialart.com) wishing to defame him. It's obvious they're disputing this literal history in order try and somehow discredit the individual in question, as they have an obvious history of doing so just be doing a google search. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by B-ham (talk • contribs).

Please do not speculate on other editors' motives, see WP:AGF and WP:NPA. The article reads like an advertisement, and quotes exactly zero external verifiable sources for any of this. It needs to establish the notability of the subject using verifiable reliable sources. And the adspeak has to go... I tagged it with a couple of cleanup tags to show the article is work in progress; that should give the article a bit of time so we can see if there is any hope it can be improved. Weregerbil 06:21, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

False, I originally wrote the article (but it looks like it was originally deleted and recreated since I last checked) and I'm not affiliated nor a major fan (though I do like some of his ideas). I mean honestly, you don't accuse fans of Shakespeare for writing the Shakespear article. Furthermore, anyone can edit in criticism. Tyciol 20:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)