Talk:Schnoodle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
|||
[edit] pov
Too pro-schnoodle: neither dogs in general nor schnoodles are universaly loved, surely. If they were, this artical would be fair. Pelegius 20:44, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Please
To assign this article "NPOV" dispute is, to me, almost comical. NPOV articles are articles on "abortion" or "George Bush" or "Southern Baptists", not a dang informative article on dogs. (Please note, POV disputer, that "article" is spelled a-r-t-i-c-l-e by the way).
It is the nature of articles on dogs and dog breeds that the article have the casual, banter-like, style that you see with the three or four of us who have contributed to this article giving our assessment of why most people who own schnoodles are satisfied with them. I find the text of the article to be completely relevant (the person punching up this article is almost certainly considering a schnoodle or other mixed breed), and I do not think that the positive qualities of schnoodles are really in dispute, nor are they even "opinions", especially as phrased here.
I do not think any reasonable person would conclude that this article, considered in its natural matrix and obvious intent, is "biased". But, let's assume it is, for the sake of your argument. What changes or type of changes would satisfy you? Shall we add the statement: "Like most dogs, the schnoodle can occasionally go poo-poo on the floor, so the dog, while hypo-allergenic, is not poo-poo-free."
I am sorry to be taking this tone with you, but this is really absurd.
[edit] congratulations
The recent reversions, editings, and general dumbings-down of this article in the past two weeks for the sake of the one silly complainer have now rendered it to "piece of crap" status to my disciplined eye. What was once a thorough, casual, and fun article on schnoodles is now a humorless, minimalistic, junk heap that's about as useful as a second anus.
So there you have it. I wash my hands of any further discussion or contribution to the article.
Have a nice day.
