Talk:SCFM

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

PLEASE use the above + tab to enter a new comment. That provides you a form in which to first enter a Subject and then enter the new comment. Please sign the comment with four tildes like this ~~~~. That automatically signs it with your user name, the date and the time. The form automatically provides subject headings like those below and enters them in the table of contents which will appear below after four comments are posted.

The first responder to someone's new comment should enter the response just beneath the new comment (instead of using the above + tab) and indent the response by starting with a colon like this :. Any second responder, indent further by starting with two colons like this :: and any third responder, start with three colons like this ::: and so forth. If we don't follow these practices, the result is jumbled mess.


[edit] Proposed outline

30 years in turbomachinery aero-thermo development has given me a good feel for how SCFM, ACFM and CFM should be defined and used. However, I'm not quite the expert on how applications and sales misuse these terms. I think all discussions of these definitions need to include the continuity equation.

Where is the discussion of "flow"?

At this moment SCFM has a good start and ACFM is out the window.

I would propose the following outline,

  • Fundamentals
    • flow
    • volume flow vs weight flow
    • inlet conditions
  • Weight Flow
  • CFM, ACFM
  • SCFM

Mkoronowski 18:11, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The discussion of centrifugal fans and the AMCA should be another article

The two sections discussing fans and the ACMA should be deleted and moved to another, new article. This article is about gas flow expressions (SCFM, ACFM, etc.) ... it is not about fans. Unless someone presents a good reason for not doing so, I will delete those sections within a few days. - mbeychok 23:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)