Talk:Scandinavian activity theory
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] References clean-up needed
With greatest surprise I found out that there was no Engerstöm's Learning by expanding on this page, in the Reference section. So, I put it there, along with the URL to the online text. Anyway, a major clean up of the reference section is needed. I am really not an expert in what the Scandinavians have done so far, therefore, I can't assess what is relevent and what is not. What is obvious anyway is that nobody will really miss at least half of the list. Yasya 18:52, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- The question is whether or not each item in the Reference section is actually being used as a source. Looks more like a reading list than references. --Ronz 19:42, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Merge with activity theory?
This article and the Activity theory article are both quite brief. There is also significant overlap. Why not merge them into one article on activity theory? Nesbit 16:28, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- This article was forked from Activity theory back in September. I don't see any need for a merge, especially since so little time has past. --Ronz 01:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for reminder! I'll contribute to the "main" Activity theory soon. --Yasya 15:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Kuutti?
There's a whole lot of Kuutti citations, but no mention in the references. Just thought I'd point that out ;-)... Mark Elliott 13:37, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Conscious / Unconscious?
For Activity Theorists "consciousness" seems to refer to any mental functioning, whereas most other approaches to psychology distinguish conscious from unconscious functions. Thinking about the hierarchy of activity, actions and operations I am not sure this sentence is true. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 134.2.190.254 (talk • contribs).
