Talk:Savannah River Site
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Contamination?
Isnt there some controvercy over this site? Does it need cleaning up or something?--x1987x 15:06, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
- It's a nuclear site, of course there's controversy (see Yucca Mountain). Independent observers can't exactly verify contamination, though... and since the site is already there, developed, and in a red state, who's really going to care? --AlexWCovington (talk) 01:55, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
It does need a decent amount of formatting work to make it easier to read. --AnthonyA7 04:36, 2 January 2006 (EST)
[edit] Clean-up or Wikifying
I spent about 3-4 hours yestereday cleaning up and Wikifying this article. But it still needs much more! I strongly question whether the time-line section needs to be so detailed and so lengthy ... especially the years 2003, 2004 and 2005, which have each turned into lengthy essays rather than a chronological timeline. Would anyone object if I severely trimmed those three years?? - mbeychok 02:48, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- It would be better left intact. See LANL
-
- Thanks for your extensive edits of Sept. 19, 2006. Please sign your name when commenting on a Talk page such as this. All you have to do is put four tildes at the end of your comment, like this ~~~~, and your comment will automatically be signed and dated. - mbeychok 15:51, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Reason for removing clean-up tag
After discussion with Wikipedia administrator Tom Harrison on his Talk page, I did an extensive cleanup, consolidation and shortening of the Timeline section. Although the cleanup I did is probably not perfect, I think it is more than enough to justify removing the cleanup tag on that section and I will do so. - mbeychok 21:11, 25 August 2006 (UTC)