Talk:Saul Zaentz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

I have recently watched the animated version of the lord of the rings, credit to Saul Zaentz for a beautiful piece of work, but why is only half the book done? I have been told they ran out of money when they were doing it but surley after all these years there would be a few bob to finish it, and im sure fans worldwide would snap it up! Audrey Westman

[edit] This is not a puff piece

A recent editor has 1) removed the info about the lawsuits between Zaentz and Fogerty, and 2) added a bunch of puffery about how wonderful this man is. Let's return it to NPOV --rogerd 21:44, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] SZ Page about SZ

No puffery here – check out the film synopses.

Let’s keep the SZ page about SZ. The John Fogerty material is duplicated on Fogerty’s Wikipedia page, which is where it belongs. There’s also a Fantasy Records page, and the history of the company including artists and their various feuds with management could go there. Please delete the paragraph in question - such statements as "Fogerty almost immediately re-signed with the label..." are Fogerty-oriented and have nothing to do with SZ. 14:42, 30 August 2006 (UTC)Olompali

[edit] Fogerty/Zaentz dispute

I think any historical coverage of either Zaentz or Fogerty should refer to the dispute between them. However, the celebrity-ness of the dispute has obscured many facts, and partisans seeking to benefit either side would do well to keep their emotions in check. For instance, it is widely assumed that Fogerty lost all his rights and royalties from CCR due to some chicanery by the label. Fogerty in fact never relinquished his writer royalties, and got rich as a result. Zaentz in turn obviously took a technical issue way too far, the "plagiarism" of The Old Man Down The Road/Run Through The Jungle. Blues and Jazz, the core of the Fantasy catalog, are overrun with unacknowledged rewrites and lifts from earlier material.

I have to side with Olompali, let's keep each bio page about the subject, and not drift off into gossipy celebrity warfare. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Seeker56 (talk • contribs) 19:59, August 31, 2006 (UTC)

I have no disagreement with Seeker56's changes. I don't know who you are talking about when you say "gossipy celebrity warfare", because all I did [1] was remove the stuff about being an "old fashioned hands-on producer", which is opinion, not fact, and restored the Fogerty/Zaentz dispute, which you added some good edits to. So what do you mean when you say that you "side with Olompali"? --rogerd 02:19, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm referring to Olompali's request to "keep the SZ page about SZ." As to gossipy celebrity warfare, I mean things like 'Yoko Ono broke up the Beatles' --these arguments take on a life of their own, and tend to crowd out the important facts in a life history. --Seeker56