Sauwastika
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The term sauwastika or sauvastika in is a term sometimes used to distinguish the "left-facing" from the "right-facing" form of the swastika symbol.[1]
The "left-facing" variant is current in Buddhism, while Hinduism uses both variants, with the "right-facing" one more common.
Contents |
[edit] Etymology
Sanskrit sauvastika is a vriddhi derivation of svastika, attested as an adjective meaning "benedictive, salutatory".[2] The term has been conflated with suavastika, a term used by Burnouf (1852), and again by Schliemann in Ilios (1880), based on a letter Max Müller, who is in turn quoting Burnouf. The term is not Sanskrit, and may be due to a mistake of Burnouf's, since it is not known from any earlier source.[3]
The term sauwastika is first used in the sense of "backwards swastika" by D'Alviella (1894):
- In India it [the gammadion] bears the name of swastika, when its arms are bent towards the right, and sauwastika when they are turned in the other direction. [1]
[edit] Claims of a distinction in Dharmic traditions
Eugene Burnouf, the first Western expert on Buddhism, stated in his book Lotus de la bonne loi (1852) that the Suavastika was a Buddhist variant of the Svastika.
When Heinrich Schliemann discovered swastika motifs in Troy, he wrote to the Indologist Max Müller, who, quoting Burnouf, confirmed this distinction, adding that "the Svastika was originally a symbol of the sun, perhaps of the vernal sun as opposed to the autumnal sun, the Suavastika, and, therefore, a natural symbol of light, life, health, and wealth." The letter was published in Schliemann's book Ilios (1880):
- "In the footprints of Buddha the Buddhists recognize no less that sixty-five auspicious signs, the first of them being the Svastika [...] (Eugene Burnouf, "Lotus de la bonne loi,", p. 625) ; the fourth is the Suavastika [sic], or that with the arms turned to the left"
The term suavastika thus cannot be confirmed as authentic and is probably due to Burnouf (1852). Notions that sauwastikas are considered "evil" or inauspicious versions of the auspicious swastika in Dharmic tradition have even less substance, since even Burouf counts the svastika and the suavastika equally among the "sixty-five auspicious signs".
D'Alviella (1894) voices doubts about the distinction:
- "Would it not be simpler to admit that the direction of the branches is of secondary importance in the symbolism of the gammadion? When it is desired to symbolize the progress of the sun, namely, its faculty of translation through space, rather than the direction in which it turns, little attention will have been paid to the direction given to the rays." (p. 68)
Although the more common form is the right-facing swastika, the symbol is used in both orientations for the sake of balance in Hinduism. Buddhists almost always use the left-facing swastika.
[edit] Claims concerning the Nazi swastika
Some contemporary writers assert that the swastika as used in Nazi Germany is in fact the "evil sauwastika".[4] Since the swastika on the Flag of Nazi Germany when displayed one-sided (e.g. hanging on buildings) was "right-facing", this requires to re-define "sauwastika" as the variant current in Hinduism, and the "swastika proper" as the "left-facing" one current in Buddhism, contrary to Burnouf. The notion that Hitler deliberately inverted the "good left-facing" Buddhist swastika is, however, wholly unsupported by any historical evidence.
[edit] Notes
- ^ Probably first by D'Alviella (1894); more recently, "sauvastika" is used to classify the geometrical form of symbols in Liungman, Symbols: Encyclopedia of Western Signs and Ideograms,HME Publishing (2004) ISBN 9197270504
- ^ according to Wilson (1819), cited by Monier-Williams.
- ^ Wilson (1896) finds that "The 'Suavastika' which Max Müller names and believes was applied to the Swastika sign, with the ends bent to the left [...] seems not to be reported with that meaning by any other author except Burnouf."; On Oriental Carpets. Article III. — The Svastika, The Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs (1903) also uses the term with reference to Müller.
- ^ e.g. Servando González (1998); González "proves" that the left-facing swastika is the sunwise one with reference to an 1930s box of Standard fireworks from Sivakasi, India.
[edit] References
- D'Alviella, The Migration of Symbols (1894)
- Eugene Burnouf, Lotus de la bonne loi (1852)
- Heinrich Schliemann, Ilios (1880)
- Thomas Wilson, The Swastika: The Earliest Known Symbol, and Its Migrations; with Observations on the Migration of Certain Industries in Prehistoric Times. Smithsonian Institution. (1896)
[edit] See also
[edit] External links
- Debunking the Nazi Backwards Swastika Myth (neo-Nazi site)
- The Swastika
- Swaztika (sic) (a scan of the original publication)
