Talk:Satwant Pasricha

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
	This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
More information about this article... ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] Old Souls

I thought Tom Shroder's book was about Ian Stevenson, not Satwant Pasricha. Could someone clarify this please. Johnfos 11:35, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Satwant Parsricha was a protege of Dr. Stevenson. During his last trip to India, they worked together and Shroder reports on it in his book. Arundhati bakshi 09:56, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Adding POV tag

I'm aware that Satwant Pasricha has co-authored a paper with Dr Stevenson and others, but so have many people. Where is the evidence that SP was Dr Stevenson's protege?

Satwant Pasricha may well have been mentioned in the book Old Souls, but it has been reported in the Washington Post that the book is about Ian Stevenson.[1] Where is the evidence that the book is about SP?

You need to refer to sources to back up your claims, or else it just looks like you are trying to inflate the importance of the person being discussed, which does not make for a neutral presentation. So I'm adding a POV tag. Johnfos 03:24, 16 March 2007 (UTC)