User talk:Sarah
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 |
Sarah is on a wiki-break and has asked for a bit of peace and quiet. If you require the assistance of an administrator, please see the list of administrators. If you wish to report a problem, please see the administrators incidents noticeboard, the administrator's noticeboard, 3RR noticeboard, vandalism intervention or the Community noticeboard.
Messages left here will be moved to Archive 13 for Sarah to read when she returns.
Contents |
[edit] Your note to $$'s and sense
Considering how politely his request to VPP was phrased, I suspect he didn't know how better to request an unban. Might you add to your "wrong way" comment some hint about what would be the "right way"? -- Ben TALK/HIST 19:01, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
(Well, I've made an effort toward that in the meantime. Enjoy your wikibreak! -- Ben TALK/HIST 22:09, 24 March 2007 (UTC) )
[edit] RFA Thanks
I would like to thank you for your support in my recent RFA. As you may or may not be aware, it passed with approximately 99% support. I ensure you that I will use the tools well, and if I ever disappoint you, I am open to recall. If you ever need anything, don't hesitate to leave me a note on my talkpage. Thanks again, ^demon[omg plz] 20:47, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] gmail in a sec
SatuSuro 14:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Suljer
Sarah,
Thanks for your assistance and for the links. They were greatly appreciated.
Cheers!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Suljer (talk • contribs).
[edit] User:Charoog10
Thanks for your help. Now I have to deal with the ten or twenty other (mainly anon) editors doing much the same sort of thing to similar articles... Still, it'll be a relief at least to have a breathing space from Charoog10. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 16:36, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- I hadn't seen that I think; I thought that they didn't get sullen and unco-operative until their teens? An early developer, perhaps. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 19:53, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- I was watching the whole "Her Name Is Nicole" debate between Charoog10 and MelEtitis and i thought the box-mode of the tracks looked more proffesional and why were you keep changing it. The poor kid was trying to help Wiki. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.94.129.104 (talk) 04:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Thanks!
Thank you for responding to my question regarding my talk page after reading the editor reviews. I appriciate the help very much. --Bfissa 19:04, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks!
Thanks Sarah for your quick response on the Mornington Peninsula! Cheers! --Chocolatemax 13:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
|
||
Volume 3, Issue 13 | 26 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
|
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:23, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] RFA Thanks
Thanks for your support on my Request for adminship, which was successful, with votes of 49/0/0.
Lemme know if you need help on something I might know a little something about....(check my userpage). |
|
---|---|
cheers, Casliber | talk | contribs 14:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] Barnstar.
The Original Barnstar | ||
I want to thank you for being completely honest in your oppose !vote. I also want to applaud you for having what I think is the best and most convincing oppose !vote ever! :) Acalamari 18:44, 28 March 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] oops
Hey, on Corby, that wasn't me, I don't know what happened, probably my error, but I was RV'ing the rack edit edits by 71.76.201.6 but somehow just put them back in. Sorry 'bout that. Grye 18:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] E-mail
Replied. You're probably drafting a furious response right now... – Riana talk 00:12, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- LOL, no furious response mate. Just grateful to have good people watching out for me. :) Sarah 00:50, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fifth Melbourne meetup
The fifth meetup of Melbourne Wikipedians is being planned as a breakfast meeting in the city with Jimbo Wales (at a venue to be arranged) on Friday, 27 April 2007.
Jimbo has proposed breakfast as the one real window of opportunity during his tightly scheduled stay in Melbourne. Tbe precise time has to be sorted out with Jimbo, but the arrangements for the equivalent Adelaide meetup a few days before may give a good idea.
Feel free to edit the relevant page in any way that might be helpful. I feel like a bit of an interloper, not having attended previous meetups. If there's anything you can do to help, I'll be grateful. Please think about whether you'll be able to make it, assuming the arrangements are similar to those Adelaide is adopting (i.e. a block of time with people being fairly free to arrive when it suits them). Some indication on the page of your possible participation would be really helpful. Metamagician3000 06:28, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] About Your Oppose.
I was never offended by your oppose, Sarah, and if I had been, that would have meant I was a biased user. I just said on Ryan's talk page that it was the longest oppose I'd ever seen before. :) As I mentioned above on your talk page, it was highly convincing. In fact, my RfA was even more "unique" (if that's an appropriate word to use) in the fact that it had three very long opposes. I've never seen that before. As for Rleve's oppose, (to me) you didn't seem impressed by it; but maybe I interpreted you incorrectly. Sorry about that. :) Acalamari 18:34, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Qxz unprotection
Not at all, I think that your assessment of the situation at WP:RPP was perfectly appropriate (and probably more level-headed and impersonal than my initial action). It's not a big deal, if Qxz is no longer editing then there shouldn't even be an issue with the talk page. Thanks for the note ˉˉanetode╦╩ 06:42, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Misunderstanding
Hello , I'm not asking you to change your vote but I would like to explain that this is actually not meant as a bait: User:Anynobody#Perhaps not the best way to ask for personal information. I've kept his name off and the mention of an organization which I don't think he is a part of but could none the less identify him and expressly stated it isn't meant to be ridicule, but an example of what not to do. Please believe me when I say if I wanted to ridicule him, I would have left his name and the OSA reference in the quote. Also, and this is perhaps the most ironic part, he's actually trying to make sure people know it's his quote whereas I wasn't.
Again please don't consider this an effort to change your vote, but please do assume good faith on my part. Anynobody 08:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] RfA thanks
- I was planning on writing a personalised thank you notice here, but any creativeness I had seems to have vanished (temporarily I hope), so I'll have to leave it at "Thank you and go pies" :)
- :) Daniel Bryant 12:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)