Talk:Sarah Brady

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Firearms WikiProject, a project devoted to the improvement of firearms coverage on Wikipedia with an emphasis on civilian firearms. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

Sarah Brady

[edit] Blurb for DYK

Did You Know

... that Sarah Brady became a leading leading advocate of gun control and other actions to reduce the amount of gun violence in the United States after her husband White House Press Secretary James Brady sustained a disabling head wound during the Reagan assassination attempt which occurred on March 30, 1981?

[edit] Honorary doctorate degrees

Its not really conventional to call someone a Dr. just because they have an honorary doctorate.--nixie 10:55, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

I had some doubts when I did that, so I have removed it in the name. The mention of the award is still in the article. Thanks. Vaoverland 18:40, May 9, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Refutation

So would it be appropriate to insert counter-arguments here, or what? This page reads as rather frightfully pro-gun control. Stiletto Null 08:07, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

Sarah Brady and her husband James are unquestionably pro-gun control, notwithstanding her incident with the straw purchase. I think a pro/con NPOV argument would be be more appropriate in the article on Gun politics. If you feel strongly, i feel that is the place to make sure the NPOV is presented. Vaoverland 08:19, 7 October 2005 (UTC)