Talk:Sapient (company)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page reads like a company biography or a press release. Particularly this picture.

+ I tend to disagree with the implied statement above that says this article must be biased because of the two factors listed. While the article does read like a company biography (not surprising considering it is a partially historical article about the company), and it does include some company press releases at the bottom, this does not make it a biased article. The article is in keeping with the standard encyclopedia format. - Netguy1776

- I agree with Netguy1776. I am going to remove the disputed neutrality tag unless the first person can at least make a recommendation for fixing the article.

The article contains scores of unsourced claims. Each one needs to be backed by a reference. The opening sentence reads like the company motto, but doesn't really state what Sapient is. Much of the article is written using weasel words. The History and Services sections aren't too bad, but need editing to fix the tone and to verify the claims. The Culture section should probably be removed (it reads like a recruiting ad), unless Sapient's culture has actually received press coverage (can't tell without references). Each client listed in Samples of Clients needs a reference, as does each award listed in Honors and Awards. The Recent Developments section reads like a company web page, and doesn't appear to be encyclopedic at all. Stick to the facts -- i.e., claims you can back up with a reference. Julesd 14:34, 4 February 2007 (UTC)